|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00881/18 & TCS00944/18 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium,
Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report (No.22) ¡V May 2020 |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared For |
|
|
||
|
|
Hsin Chong Tsun
Yip Joint Venture & Sang Hing Civil Contractors Co., Ltd |
|
|
||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
11 June 2020 |
TCS00881/18/600/R0428v2 |
|
|
Nicola Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
Tam Tak Wing (Environmental
Team Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Remarks |
1 |
5 June 2020 |
First Submission |
2 |
11 June 2020 |
Amended
according to the IEC¡¦s comments on 11 June 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive summary
ES.01.
This
is the 22nd Monthly Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report summarizing the monitoring results and inspection findings under the
Project for the period from 1st to 31st May 2020 (the Reporting Month).
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Activities
ES.02.
In the Reporting Month, the major construction works under the
Project included Contract CV/2016/10 (hereinafter named ¡§Contract 1¡¨) and Contract
CV/2017/02 (hereinafter named ¡§Contract 2¡¨). Environmental monitoring activities under the EM&A
programme in this Reporting Month are summarized in the following table.
Table ES-1 Summary of EM&A Programme
in the Reporting Month
Issues |
Environmental Monitoring Parameters /
Inspection |
Monitoring Locations |
Total Occasions |
|
CV/2016/10 |
CV/2017/02 |
|||
Air
Quality |
1-hour
TSP |
ASR-1 |
ASR-2 ASR-3 |
45 |
24-hour TSP |
15 |
|||
Construction Noise |
Leq
(30min) Daytime |
CN-1 CN-2 |
CN-3 CN-4 |
16 |
Water
Quality |
In-situ
measurement and Water sampling |
M3 |
M1, M2 and M4 |
13 |
Ecology |
Sensitive Habitat |
Transect within site area of CV/2016/10 |
Transect within site area of CV/2017/02 |
1 |
Landscape
& Visual |
Site Inspection |
Site area of CV/2016/10 |
Site area of CV/2017/02 |
1 |
Inspection
& Audit |
Environmental
Team (ET) Regular
Environmental Site Inspection |
Site area of CV/2016/10 |
Site area of CV/2017/02 |
4 |
Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) Monthly Environmental Site Audit |
1 |
Breach of Action and Limit
(A/L) Levels
ES.03.
In the Reporting Month, no exceedance of air quality, noise
monitoring was recorded. However, for water quality monitoring, 10 Limit Level
non-project related exceedances were recorded. The statistics of environmental exceedance,
Notification of
Exceedance (NOE) issued and investigation of exceedance are summarized in the
following table.
Table ES-2 Breach
of Action and Limit (A/L) Levels in the Reporting Month
Environmental Issues |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit
Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation Findings |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air
Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
24-hour
TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq30min
Daytime |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
Turbidity |
0 |
5 |
0 |
Not project
related |
-- |
|
SS |
0 |
5 |
0 |
Not project
related |
-- |
Note: NOE
¡V Notification of Exceedance
ES.04.
Monthly ecological
monitoring for sensitive habitat for area of Contract 1 and
Contract 2 were
undertaken on 12th May 2020. As advised
by both Contractors, there were no vegetation clearance conducted within
the site in the Reporting Month and therefore precautionary check for the presence of nesting birds was not required.
ES.05.
Landscape and visual inspection at
both Contracts were undertaken on 27th May
2020. The Contractor was
reminded to prevent the construction material pile within Tree Protection Zone
(TPZ) and ensure no works is allowed within the TPZ.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLAINT
ES.06.
No
environmental complaint was recorded or received in this Reporting Month. The statistics of environmental
complaint are summarized in the following table.
Table ES-3 Environmental
Complaint Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Month |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
1
¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Contract 2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
ES.07.
In addition, no complaint and emergency event
relating to violation of environmental legislation for illegal dumping and landfilling was
received.
Notification of
Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES.08.
No
environmental summons or successful prosecution was recorded in this Reporting Month. The statistics of summons or successful
prosecutions are summarized in the following tables.
Table ES-4 Environmental
Summons Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Month |
Environmental Summons Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Summons Nature |
||
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract
1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Contract
2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table ES-5 Environmental
Prosecution Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Month |
Environmental Prosecution Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Prosecution Nature |
||
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract
1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Contract
2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Reporting Change
ES.09.
No reporting change was
made in the Reporting Month.
Site Inspection
ES.010. In the Reporting Month, joint site inspections for Contract 1 to evaluate the site
environmental performance were carried out by the Resident
Engineer (RE), ET and the Contractor of the
Contract 1 on 7th,
14th, 21st and 28th May
2020.
Moreover, joint
site inspections for Contract 2 by the RE, ET and the Contractor of
Contract 2 were carried out on 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th May
2020. IEC attended the both Contract
joint site inspection on 14th May 2020. No non-compliance was noted
during the site inspections.
ES.011. During wet
season, the Contractors are reminded to pay special attention on water quality mitigation measures and should fully implement the measures as recommended
in the EM&A Manual, in
particular to prevent surface runoff and other pollutants from flowing to local
stream and Conservation Area.
ES.012.
Air
quality mitigation measures such as wheel wash facilities, watering of haul
roads, loose soil construction surface and covering of dusty materials with
tarpaulin sheet should be implemented as far as practicable.
ES.013.
Construction noise mitigation measures such as use
of movable noise barriers and Quality Powered Mechanical Equipment should be properly provided to reduce construction noise impact, where appropriate.
ES.014.
The Contractors should properly maintain the cleanliness and tidiness of the site. In addition, mosquito control should be
performed to prevent mosquito breeding on site.
Table of Contents
2. Project Organization and Construction
progress
2.1 Construction Contract Packaging
2.3 Summary of Environmental Submissions
2.4 Summary of Submission Under the Environmental Permit Requirements
3. Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirement
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.7 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
3.8 Determination
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
5.2 Noise
Monitoring Exceedance
6.2 Water
Quality Monitoring Exceedance
7.3 Ecological
Monitoring Survey Findings (Contract
1)
7.4 Ecological
Monitoring Survey Findings (Contract
2)
7.5 Measure
for Protection of Nesting Bird
8.2 Findings
/ Deficiencies During Site Inspection in the Reporting Month
9.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
10.2 Findings
/ Deficiencies During Site Inspection in the Reporting Month
11. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
11.1 Environmental
Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
12. Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
12.2 Tentative
Construction Activities in the Coming Month
12.3 Key
Issues for the Coming Month
13. Conclusions
and Recommentations
List of TABLES
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits for Contract 1
Table 2-2 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits for Contract 2
Table 2-3 Status
of Submission as under FEP for Contract 1
Table 2-4 Status
of Submission as under FEP for Contract 2
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Designated
Air Quality Monitoring Location under the Project
Table 3-3 Designated
Construction Noise Monitoring Location under the Project
Table 3-4 Designated
Water Quality Monitoring Stations under the Project
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-6 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-8 Action
and Limit Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-10 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results at ASR-1 under Contract 1
Table 4-2 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results at ASR-2 under Contract 2
Table 4-3 Summary
of Air Quality Monitoring Results at ASR-3a under Contract 2
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results under Contract 1
Table 5-2 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results under Contract 2
Table 6-1 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V M3 under Contract 1
Table 6-2 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results (M1, M2 and M4) under Contract 2
Table 6-3 Summary
of Field Measurements for Water Quality
Table 6-4 Action
and Limit (A/L) Levels Exceedance Record
Table 6-5 Summary
of Investigation of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Month
Table 7-1 Action
and Limit Levels for Wet Woodland Habitats Monitoring
Table 7-2 Action
and Limit Levels for Non-Wet Woodland Habitats Monitoring
Table 7-3 Schedule
of Faunal Surveys in each year During Construction Phase
Table 7-4 Result
of Faunal Survey under Contract 1
Table 7-5 Result
of Freshwater Communities Survey under Contract 1
Table 7-6 Result
of Faunal Survey under Contract 2
Table 7-7 Result
of Freshwater Communities Survey under Contract 2
Table 8-1 Landscape
& Visual Inspection Finding for Contract 1
Table 8-2 Landscape
& Visual Inspection Finding for Contract 2
Table 9-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 9-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 10-1 Site Observations
for the Works of Contract 1
Table 10-2 Site Observations
for the Works of Contract 2
Table 11-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 11-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 11-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Table 12-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List
of Appendices
Appendix A Layout Plan of the Project
Appendix B Organization Structure and Contact
Details of Relevant Parties
Appendix C Three Months rolling Programme
Appendix D Designated Monitoring Locations
Appendix E Calibration Certificates of MONITORING
EQUIPMENT and Laboratory Certificate
Appendix F Event and Action Plan
of Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality
Appendix G Monitoring Schedules of the
Reporting Month and Coming Month
Appendix H Monitoring Data of 24-Hour
TSP Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality
Appendix I Graphical Plots of Air Quality,
Noise and Water Quality
Appendix J Meteorological Data of
the Reporting Month
Appendix K Ecological Survey Report
Appendix L Landscape & Visual
Inspection Checklist
Appendix M Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table
Appendix N Implementation Schedule for
Environmental Mitigation Measures (ISEMM)
Appendix O Implementation of Water
Quality Mitigation Measures
1.1.1
Civil Engineering
and Development Department (CEDD) is the
Project Proponent for the Project ¡§Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium,
Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery¡¨. The Project is a Designated Project to be implemented
under Environmental Permit No. EP-534/2017/A and FEP-01/534/2017/A. The layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix
A. Major works to be executed under the Project shall include to the
following:
A Designated Works under EP-534/2017/A
(i)
Site formation of about 8 hectares of
land and associated drainage, sewerage and landscape works for development of
Columbarium and Crematorium facilities at the Sandy Ridge Cemetery;
(ii)
Construction of a new road (about 600m)
including a section of viaduct connecting the platform for Crematorium and Man
Kam To Road and the pick-up/drop-off point at Man Kam To Road;
(iii)
Widening of about 900m of the existing
Sha Ling Road;
(iv)
Widening of about 1.4km of the existing
Lin Ma Hang Road; and
(v)
Improvement works to the existing
barging point at Siu Lam
Non-Designated Works
(i)
Construction of a sewage detention tank
complete with odour and septicity control mechanism;
(ii)
Construction of noise barriers along Sha
Ling Road;
(iii)
Construction of a new Refuse Collection
Point (RCP) near the junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling Road;
(iv)
Landscaping works (including both hard
and soft landscape works);
(v)
Associated tree felling, transplanting
and compensatory planting works;
(vi)
Associated street lighting, street
furniture and road marking, etc.; and
(vii) Other
works which are specified in PS of the Contract.
1.1.2
To facilitate the Project management, the Project works were separated into three Contracts to be executed which
are described in below sub-sections.
1.1.3
Contract No. CV/2016/10 ¡V Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium
at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereinafter
named ¡§Contract 1¡¨):-
Site formation of about 1.77 ha of land for the proposed pick-up
and drop-off area for shuttle bus operation;
Upgrading of a section of 900m existing Sha Ling Road from 3m wide
carriageway to 7.3m wide carriageway with footpath at both sides;
Construction of one EVA with a total length of about 160m;
Construction of noise barriers along Sha Ling Road;
Modification of junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling
Road;
Construction of a new pick up / drop off point at Man Kam To Road;
Relocation and construction of a new refuse collection point near
junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling Road;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures;
Associated drainage, sewerage and waterworks along Sha Ling Road;
and
Associated landscaping works.
1.1.4
Contract
No. CV/2017/02 ¡V Infrastructural Works at Man Kam To Road and Lin Ma Hang Road
for Development of Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereinafter
named ¡§Contract 2¡¨):-
Construction of a new road connecting Columbarium site to
Crematorium site;
Construction of one EVA with a total length of about 300m;
Widening of a section of 1.4 km long Lin Ma Hang Road (between Man
Kam To Road and Ping Yuen River) from 6m wide carriageway to 7.3m with 2m width
footpath on both sides;
Provision of a pair of lay-by at Lin Ma Hang Road;
Construction of a new vehicular access connecting the Sheung Shui
Landmark North PTI and Lung Sum Avenue;
Construction of covered walkway along Fanling Station Road;
Removal of planters and central divider along Fanling Station Road
and San Wan Road;
Associated drainage, sewerage, waterworks and utility works along
Man Kam To Road and Lin Ma Hang Road;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures; and
Associated landscaping works.
1.1.5
CEDD
Contract No. (to be confirmed):-
Site Formation for the platform of the columbarium site;
Construction of two 2 at-grade access roads;
Construction of road junction between Man Kam To Road and the new
access road;
Associated drainage, sewerage and waterworks along the two new
access roads;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures; and
Associated landscaping works
1.1.6
Hsin Chong Tsun Yip
Joint Venture (hereafter referred as ¡§HCTYJV¡¨) has been awarded Contract 1 on 5 December 2017. According to the Contract requirement, HCTYJV shall take over the responsibility for part of the Environmental Permit No. EP-534/2017 for ease of management, therefore application for Further Environmental Permit was submitted by HCTYJV to EPD on 26 January 2018 and Further Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/534/2017
was granted to
HCTYJV by EPD on
23 February 2018. Furthermore,
EPD issued Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/534/2017/A on 24 December 2018.
1.1.7
Sang Hing Civil Contractors Company Limited
(hereinafter referred
as ¡§Sang
Hing¡¨) was awarded Contract 2 on 23 May 2018.
The Contract Works is a Designated Project as under Environmental Permit
(EP) No. EP-534/2017. Furthermore, EPD issued Environmental Permit No. EP-534/2017/A on 24 December 2018.
1.1.8
Action-United
Environmental Services & Consulting (AUES) has been commissioned by the Contractors as an Environmental Team (ET) to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) programme in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual as well as
the associated duties. As part of
the EM&A programme, baseline monitoring
to determine the ambient environmental conditions was completed before construction work commencement. The Baseline Monitoring Report (air, noise and water) certified
by ET Leader (ETL) and verified by Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) was
submitted to Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and it was approved by EPD on 25 October 2018.
1.1.9
Major construction work of Contract 1 was
commenced on 16 August 2018 and Contract 2 on 5 November 2018.
1.1.10 This is the 22nd Monthly EM&A Report summarizing the monitoring results and inspection findings for
the period
from 1st to 31st May 2020.
1.2.1
The
Monthly EM&A Report is
structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and Construction Progress
Section 3 Summary of Monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring Results
Section 5 Noise Monitoring Results
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring Results
Section 7 Ecology Monitoring Results
Section 8 Landscape & Visual
Section 9 Waste Management
Section 10 Site Inspections
Section 11 Environmental Complaints and Non-Compliance
Section 12 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 13 Conclusions and Recommendation
2.1.1
To facilitate the project management and implementation, the
Project was divided
by the following contracts:
Contract
1 (Contract No.
CV/2016/10)
Contract
2 (Contract No.
CV/2017/02)
Contract
3 (Contract No. TBA)
2.1.2
Organization
structure and contact details of relevant parties with respect to on-site
environmental management are shown in Appendix B.
2.2.1
The
three-month rolling construction programme for Contract
1 and Contract 2 are enclosed
in Appendix C. Construction activities of the Contract 1 and Contract
2 undertaken in the Reporting Month are presented
below.
Contract 1
(CV/2016/10)
l General site housekeeping
l Bulk Excavation
l
Construction of Cut Slope, installation of soil nailing and construction
of surface channel
l
Construction of retaining wall for Fill Slope.
l
Construction of Fill Slope and surface
channel
l
Construction of Pick-up and Drop-off
Point near Man Kam To Road
Contract 2 (CV/2017/02)
l
Construction of Manhole, gullies, drainage pipe at Lin Ma Hang
Road between CH380-430 Northbound & CH1165-1265 Northbound.
l
Man Kam To Road DN800 DI Sewerage Pipe FM4.19-FM4.22(100m)
l
Soil Nail Works at Lin Ma Hang Road Slope C225 & C231
l
Filling Works and drainage works for slope FS18 (Part A1)
l
Backfilling of Retaining Wall 13
l
Piling Works for Retaining Wall 14
2.3.1
Summary of the relevant permits, licenses,
and/or notifications on environmental protection for the Project in this Reporting
Month is presented in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.
Table
2-1 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits for Contract 1
Item |
Description |
License/ Permit ref
no. |
License/ Permit Status |
1 |
Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. no. 428909 Acknowledged by EPD on 20/12/2017 |
Valid |
2 |
Chemical
waste Producer Registration |
WPN:
5231-641-H3937-01 Issued by EPD on 27/03/2018 |
Valid |
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance |
License no. WT00030795-2018 Issued
date: 9/5/2018 Expire
Date: 31/5/2023 |
Valid |
4 |
Billing
Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account
no.: 7029769 |
Valid |
5 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN0222-20 (expired on 30 Sep 2020) |
Valid |
Table
2-2 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits for Contract 2
Item |
Description |
License/ Permit ref
no. |
License/ Permit Status |
||
1 |
Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. no. 440406 Acknowledged by EPD on 14/12/2018 |
Man Kam To Road (near Sha Ling Road to Kong Nga
Po Road |
Valid |
|
Ref. no. 440405 Acknowledged by EPD on 14/12/2018 |
Fanling Station Road |
Valid |
|||
Ref. no. 440404 Acknowledged by EPD on 14/12/2018 |
Sa Ling Road (Sandy Ridge Cemetery) |
Valid |
|||
Ref. no. 440401 Acknowledged by EPD on 14/12/2018 |
Lin Ma Hang Road (San Uk
Ling ¡V Muk Wu Nga Yiu) |
Valid |
|||
Ref. no. 440402 Acknowledged by EPD on 14/12/2018 |
Lung Sum Avenue (near Landmark North) |
Valid |
|||
2 |
Chemical
waste Producer Registration |
WPN:
5213-641-S4151-01 Issued by EPD on 04/02/2019 |
Valid |
||
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance |
License no: WT00032936-2018 Issued date: 16/01/2019 Expire Date: 31/01/2024 |
Man Kam To Road & Lin Ma Hang Road, Man Kam
To |
Valid |
|
License no: WT00033335-2019 Issued date: 29/03/2019 Expire Date: 31/03/2024 |
Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery |
Valid |
|||
License no: WT00034717-2019 Issued date: 9/10/2019 Expire Date: 31/10/2024 |
Fanling Station Road |
Valid |
|||
4 |
Billing
Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account
no.: 7031098 |
Valid |
||
2.4.1
Tables 2-3 to 2-4 summarized the
submission status under the EP and/or FEP stipulation in the Reporting Month.
Table
2-3 Status of Submission as under FEP
Item |
EP and / or FEP
Stipulation |
Description |
Status |
1 |
Condition 2.10 of FEP |
Management organization of : i) the main
construction companies; ii) ET; and iii) IEC and the supporting team |
Submitted on 11 April
2018 |
2 |
Condition 2.11 of FEP |
i) Detailed phasing programme of all construction works;
and ii) Location plan of all construction works |
Submitted on 12 April
2018 |
3 |
Condition 2.12 of
FEP |
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) |
Approved
by EPD on 27 May 2019 |
4 |
Condition 2.13 of FEP |
Grassland Reinstatement Plan |
Re-submitted on 31 May 2019 |
5 |
Condition 2.14 of FEP |
Vegetation Survey
Report for Contract 1 |
Approved by EPD on 12 October
2018 |
6 |
Condition 2.15 of FEP |
Vegetation Transplantation Proposal
Contract 1 |
Approved by EPD on 12 October
2018 |
7 |
Condition 2.17 of FEP |
Woodland
Compensation Plan (Rev.04) |
Re-submitted on 13 Mar 2020 |
8 |
Condition 2.18 of FEP |
Monitoring and
Survey Plan for Golden-headed Cisticola for
Contract 1 (Rev.02) |
Approved by EPD on 22 Oct 2019 |
9 |
Condition 2.20 of FEP |
Landscape
& Visual Mitigation and Tree Preservation Plan(s)
Contract 1 (Rev.04) |
Re-submitted on 17 Apr 2020 |
10 |
Condition 2.22 of FEP |
Traffic Noise
Mitigation Plan Contract 1 (Rev. 4) |
Re-submitted on 10 Nov 2019 |
11 |
Condition 3.3 of the FEP |
Baseline Monitoring
Report (Air, Noise and Water) |
Approved by EPD on 25 October
2018 |
12 |
Condition 4.2 of the FEP |
The Contract Internet website |
Internet website address has notified EPD on 15 Jun 2018 |
Table
2-4 Status of Submission as under EP
Item |
EP and / or FEP
Stipulation |
Description |
Status |
1a |
Condition 2.10 of EP |
Management organization of : i) the main
construction companies; ii) ET; and iii) IEC and the supporting team |
Submitted on 24 September 2018 |
2a |
Condition 2.11 of EP |
i) Detailed phasing programme of all construction works;
and ii) Location plan of all construction works |
Submitted on 26 September 2018 |
3 |
Condition 2.13 of
EP |
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) |
Approved
by EPD on 27 May 2019 |
4 |
Condition 2.14 of EP |
Grassland Reinstatement Plan |
Re-submitted on 31 May 2019 |
5 |
Condition 2.15 of EP and |
Vegetation Survey
Report Contract 2 |
Re-submitted on 30 Oct 2019 |
6 |
Condition 2.16 of EP |
Vegetation Transplantation Proposal
Contract 2 |
Re-submitted on 30 Oct 2019 |
7 |
Condition 2.18 of EP |
Woodland
Compensation Plan (Rev.04) |
Re-submitted on 13 Mar 2020 |
8 |
Condition 2.19 of EP |
Monitoring and
Survey Plan for Golden-headed Cisticola
Contract 2 |
Re-submitted on 30 Oct 2019 |
9 |
Condition 2.22 of EP |
Landscape
& Visual Mitigation and Tree Preservation Plan(s)
Contract 2 |
Re-submitted on 25 Mar 2019 |
10 |
Condition 2.24 of EP |
Traffic Noise
Mitigation Plan Contract 2 |
Re-submitted on 12 Aug 2019 |
11 |
Condition 3.3 of the EP |
Baseline Monitoring
Report (Air, Noise and Water) |
Approved by EPD on 25 October
2018 |
12 |
Condition 4.2 of the EP |
The Contract Internet website |
Internet website address has notified EPD on 15 June 2018 |
3.1.1
The EM&A requirements are set out in the Approved EM&A Manual.
Environmental issues such as air quality, construction noise, water quality and
ecology were identified as the key issues during the construction phase of the
Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A impact monitoring shall cover the following
environmental aspect:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise;
•
Water quality;
•
Ecology; and
•
Landscape and visual
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is presented in Table
3-1 below
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Issue |
Parameters |
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP; 24-hour TSP |
Noise |
Leq(30min) during normal working hours.; and
Leq(15min) during the construction works undertaken in
Restricted Hours |
Water Quality |
In-situ
Measurements Dissolved Oxygen
Concentration (mg/L) & Saturation (% ); Temperature (¢J); Turbidity (NTU); Salinity
(ppm) pH unit; Water depth (m); and Stream
Flow Velocity (m/sec). |
Laboratory Analysis Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
|
Ecology |
Ecologically sensitive habitats
(wetland habitats and non-wetland habitats) |
3.3.1
According to the
Approved EM&A Manual of the Project ¡V Site Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for
Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge
Cemetery, the designated monitoring
locations for air quality, noise, water quality and ecology under the monitoring programme, is shown in Appendix D.
3.3.2
Since the Project was divided
into three Works Contracts and all Contracts will be
commenced at different time, the
construction phase impact monitoring will only be performed at the
Contract-related monitoring stations upon commencement of each
Contract Works.
Air Quality
3.3.3
There were three (3) designated
air quality monitoring
stations recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual
Section 5.6.1.1. There was proposed
relocation of air quality monitoring location ASR-3 in October 2018 since the
landlord refused to set up the HVS at his premises and nearby Conservation Area
due to noise nuisance and Muk Wu Nga Yiu House No. 2A
was proposed as alternative location ASR-3a. The proposal
dated on 9 November 2018 which verified by IEC was submitted to EPD for
approval. Based on rationale in Section 3.3.2, the Contract-related air quality monitoring location
for construction
phase were summarized in Table 3-2 and illustrated in Appendix D.
Table 3-2 Designated
Air Quality Monitoring Location under the Project
Location
ID |
Description in EM&A
Manual |
Location |
Related Work Contract |
ASR-1 |
Village House along Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling
Village House No.6 |
Contract 1 |
ASR-2 |
Village
House at San Uk Ling |
San Uk Ling Village House No.1 |
Contract 2 |
ASR-3 |
Village House at Muk Wu Nga
Yiu |
Muk Wu Nga Yiu House No.28 |
Contract 2 |
ASR-3a (#) |
Village House at Muk Wu Nga
Yiu |
Muk Wu Nga Yiu House No.2A |
Contract 2 |
Remark: (#)
There was
proposed relocation of air quality monitoring location ASR-3 in October 2018. The proposal dated on 9 November 2018 after verified by IEC
was submitted to EPD for approval.
3.3.4
If the designated monitoring location
is required to relocate, alternative monitoring location shall agree with IEC and seek for EPD approval which
shall meet the following
criteria:
i)
Be at the site
boundary or such locations close to the major dust emission source;
ii)
Close to the sensitive receptors;
iii)
Take into account the prevailing
meteorological conditions;
iv)
For monitoring location located in the
vicinity of the ASRs, care shall be taken to cause minimal disturbance to the
occupants during monitoring.
v)
When positioning the HVS, the following
points shall be
noted:
a.
a horizontal platform with appropriate support
to secure the samples against gusty wind shall be provided;
b.
no two samplers shall be placed less than 2m
apart;
c.
the distance between the HVS and an obstacle,
such as buildings, must be at least twice the height that the obstacle
protrudes above the HVS;
d.
a minimum of 2 m separation from walls, parapets and
penthouses is required for HVS at the rooftop;
e.
a minimum of 2 m separation from any supporting structure,
measures horizontally is required;
f.
no furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
g.
airflow around the sampler is unrestricted;
h.
the HVS is more than 20 m from the dripline;
i.
any wire fence and gate to protect the HVS,
shall not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
j.
permission must be obtained to set up the HVS
and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and
k.
a secured
supply of electricity is needed to operate the HVS.
Construction
Noise
3.3.5
There were four (4) designated noise monitoring
locations recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual
Section 6.5.1.1. Based on rationale in Section 3.3.2, the Contract-related noise quality monitoring location for construction
phase were summarized in Table 3-3 and illustrated in Appendix D.
Table 3-3 Designated
Construction Noise Monitoring Location under the Project
Location
ID |
Description in EM&A
Manual |
Location |
Related Work Contract |
CN-1 |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road (free
field condition) |
Contract 1 |
CN-2 |
Village house to
the north of Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling Village House No. 25 (free field condition) |
Contract 1 & 3 |
CN-3 |
Village house near
San Uk Ling |
San Uk Ling Village House No. 18 (free field condition) |
Contract 2 |
CN-4 |
Village
house of Muk Wu |
Muk Wu Village House No. 267 (1m façade from the building) |
Contract 2 |
Water Quality
3.3.6
There were four (4) water quality monitoring
locations recommended in the Approved EM&A
Manual Section 7.6.1.2. The locations and coordinates of water quality monitoring were listed in Table 3-4. Based on rationale in Section 3.3.2, the Contract-related water quality monitoring location
for construction
phase were summarized in Table 3-4 and illustrated in Appendix D.
Table 3-4 Designated
Water Quality Monitoring Stations under the Project
Proposed Location ID |
Co-ordinates |
Description |
Related Work Contract |
|
North |
East |
|||
M1 |
843 431 |
831 308 |
Midstream
of Nam Hang Stream |
Contract 2 |
M2 |
843 840 |
831 101 |
Downstream
of Nam Hang Stream |
Contract 2 |
M3 |
843 509 |
830 040 |
Wetland
in the Conservation Area near Yuen Leng Chai |
Contract 1 |
M4 |
843 997 |
831 783 |
Watercourse across Lin Ma
Hang Road, running from east of San Uk Ling to Man
Kam To Boundary Control Point |
Contract 2 |
3.4.1
The requirements of impact monitoring were stipulated in Sections 5.8.1.1, 6.7.1.1 and
7.8.1.4 of the approved EM&A
Manual and presented as follows.
Air Quality
Monitoring
3.4.2
Monitoring frequency for air quality impact monitoring is as follows:
1-Hour TSP |
3 sets of 1-hour TSP monitoring shall be
carried out once every six days during construction periods |
24-Hour TSP |
24-hour TSP monitoring shall be carried
out every six days during construction periods |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.3
Noise impact monitoring shall be carried out once per week during
construction periods. The noise measurement
for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours shall be measured in terms of Leq (30 minutes) or 6 sets of Leq (5mins).
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.4
The monitoring frequency shall be 3 days per week during
construction phase and the interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less
than 36 hours.
3.5.1
The
monitoring equipment using for the EM&A program as proposed by the ET shall
be verified by the IEC.
Air Quality
Monitoring
3.5.2
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be measured by following
the standard high volume sampling method as set out in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If ET proposes to use a direct reading
dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient information
to IEC for approval.
3.5.3
The filter paper
of 24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory.
3.5.4
All equipment used by ET for air quality monitoring is listed in Table
3-5.
Table 3-5 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-hour TSP |
|
High Volume Air
Sampler (HVAS) |
TISCH High Volume Air Sampler, HVS Model
TE-5170 |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH Model TE-5025A |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3 Laser Dust monitor
Particle Mass Profiler & Counter |
Wind Data Monitoring Equipment
3.5.5
According to the approved EM&A Manual, wind data monitoring
equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging wind speed and wind
direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall
be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind data
monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m above ground so that
they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data logger. The data shall
be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be re-calibrated at
least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees
each.
3.5.6
ET has liaised with the premises owners/ landlords to grant the permission
for the HVS installation. However, they rejected to set
up wind data
monitoring equipment installation in their premises.
3.5.7
Under this situation, the ET proposed to obtain representative
wind data from the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Weather Station. Ta Kwu Ling Station is located near the Project site which situated at the sea level above 15mPD and
the wind data
monitoring equipment is installed 10 m above the existing ground.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.8
Sound level meter in compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1)
and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise
monitoring. The sound level meter
shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator. The wind speed shall be checked with a
portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in ms-1
before each noise monitoring event.
Noise measurements should not be made in fog, rain, wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m s-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m s-1.
3.5.9
Noise monitoring equipment used for impact monitoring is listed in
Table
3-6.
Table 3-6 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K
Type 2238 |
Calibrator |
B&K
Type 4231 |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
3.5.10 Sound level meters listed above
comply with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1)
and 804: 1985 (Type 1)
specifications, as recommended in TM issued under the NCO.
Water Quality
Monitoring
3.5.11 Water
quality parameters include dissolved oxygen, water
temperature & depth, turbidity, salinity, pH and stream flow velocity shall
be measured in-situ, and suspended solids shall be analyzed by a HOKLAS-accredited
testing laboratory.
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measurement
3.5.12 The dissolved oxygen (DO)
measuring instruments should be portable and weatherproof. The equipment should
also complete with cable and sensor, and DC power source. It should be capable
of measuring:
• A DO level
in the range of 0 ¡V 20 mg/L and 0 ¡V 200% saturation; and
• A temperature of 0 ¡V 45 degree Celsius.
3.5.13
The
equipment should have a membrane electrode with automatic temperature
compensation complete with a cable.
3.5.14
Should
salinity compensation not be built-in to the DO equipment, in-situ salinity
should be measured to calibrate the DO measuring instruments prior to each
measurement.
Turbidity Measurement
3.5.15
The turbidity measuring instruments should be
a portable and weatherproof with DC power source. It should have a photoelectric sensor
capable of measuring turbidity level between 0¡V1000 NTU (for example, Hach model 2100Q or an
approved similar instrument).
Salinity Measurement
3.5.16
A portable
salinometer capable of measuring salinity in the range of 0¡V40 parts per
thousand (ppt) should be provided for measuring
salinity of the water at each monitoring location.
pH Measurement
3.5.17
A portable pH meter capable of measuring a
range between 0.0 and 14.0 should be provided to measure pH under the specified
conditions accordingly to the APHA Standard Methods.
Water Depth Measurement
3.5.18
A portable, battery-operated echo sounder or
an approved similar instrument should be used for water depths determination at
each designated monitoring station.
Stream Flow Velocity Equipment
3.5.19
Since the EM&A Manuals do not specified instrument to use
stream flow velocity measurement, the monitoring of stream flow velocity is
therefore proposed to be conducted by using a flow probe which is a digital
water velocity meter.
Water Sampling Equipment
3.5.20
A water sampler is required for suspended
solid (SS) monitoring. A water sampler e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler, which is a transparent PVC cylinder
with capacity not less than 2 litres, will be used
for water sampling if water depth over than 0.5m.
3.5.21
For sampling from very shallow water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water
sample will be collected from water surface below 100mm using plastic bottle to avoid
inclusion of bottom sediment or humus.
Moreover, Teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling buckets maybe
used for water sampling. The
equipment used for sampling will be depended the sampling location and depth
situations.
Sample Containers and Storage
3.5.22
Water samples for suspended solid should be
stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in
ice (cooled to 4¢XC without being frozen) and delivered to the laboratory within 24
hours of collection and be analyzed as soon as possible after collection.
3.5.23 Analysis of suspended solids
should be carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited laboratory. Water samples
of about 1L should be collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the
laboratory suspended solids determination. The SS determination work should start
within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. The SS analyses should
follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D
with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.24 Details of the equipment used for water
quality monitoring are listed in Table 3-7 below.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth Detector |
Tape measures |
Water Sampler |
A
2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at both ends or Teflon/stainless
steel bailer or self-made sampling bucket |
Thermometer & DO meter |
YSI Professional DSS/ YSI 550A |
pH meter |
AZ8685 pH meter /
YSI Professional DSS |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q/ YSI Professional DSS |
Salinometer |
Atago refractometer Atago S
Salinity Meter / YSI Professional DSS |
Stream Flow Velocity |
FP211 Global Flow Probe |
Sample Container |
High density polythene
bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-litter plastic
cool box with Ice pad |
3.5.25 Furthermore, Suspended solids (SS) analysis was carried out by ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd. Which is one a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory
3.6.1
The HVAS is operated and calibrated on a regular basis in
accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch
Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A.
Calibration would carry out at fortnightly interval. The calibration data are properly
documented and the records are maintained by ET for future reference. Furthermore, Tisch Calibration Kit will be
calibrated by the manufacturer in yearly basis.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter calibrated by a local HOKLAS-accredited
laboratory would be undertaken in yearly basis. Zero response of the equipment was
checked before and after each monitoring event.
3.6.3
The sound level meter and acoustic calibrator are
calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other
international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.6.4
The multi-parameter Water Quality Monitoring
System is calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.6.5
All updated calibration certificates of
the monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program in this
Reporting Month are attached in Appendix E.
3.7.1
The
impact monitoring data are handled by the ET¡¦s systematic data recording and
management, which complies with in-house Quality Management System. Standard
Field Data Sheets (FDS) are used in the impact monitoring program.
3.7.2
The
monitoring data recorded in the equipment e.g. 1-hour TSP meter, noise meter
and Multi-parameter Water
Quality Monitoring System are downloaded
directly from the equipment at the end of each monitoring day. The downloaded monitoring data are input
into a computerized database properly maintained by the ET. The laboratory results are input
directly into the computerized database and QA/QC checked by personnel other
than those who input the data. For
monitoring activities require laboratory analysis, the local laboratory follows
the QA/QC requirements as set out under the HOKLAS scheme for all laboratory
testing.
3.8.1
The baseline monitoring results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact monitoring. The air quality, construction noise and
water quality criteria, namely Action and Limit levels were established according to
Approved EM&A Manual, and they are listed in Tables 3-8, 3-9 and
3-10 below.
Table 3-8 Action and Limit Levels for Air
Quality Monitoring
Monitoring Station |
Action Level (mg /m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
1-hour TSP |
24-hour TSP |
|
ASR-1 |
331 |
181 |
500 |
260 |
ASR-2 |
316 |
165 |
500 |
260 |
ASR-3 |
307 |
160 |
500 |
260 |
Table 3-9 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Monitoring Location |
Action Level |
Limit Level in dB(A) |
Time Period: 0700-1900 hours
on normal weekdays |
||
CN-1,CN-2, CN-3, CN-4 |
When
one or more documented complaints are received |
75 dB(A) |
Note: * Reduces to 70 dB(A)
for schools and 65 dB(A) during the school examination periods.
Table 3-10 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Parameter |
Performance criteria |
Monitoring Location |
|||
M1 |
M2 |
M3 |
M4 |
||
DO (mg/L) |
Action Level |
3.03 |
4.99 |
4.58 |
3.62 |
Limit Level |
2.97 |
4.90 |
4.49 |
3.52 |
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
Action Level |
7.1 |
39.7 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
Limit Level |
7.6 |
42.2 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
|
SS (mg/L) |
Action Level |
8.5 |
29.0 |
9.3 |
4.8 |
Limit Level |
10.1 |
31.0 |
9.5 |
5.0 |
|
Notes: •
For DO, non-compliance of the water
quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits •
For turbidity and SS, non-compliance of
the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the
limits. |
3.8.2
Should
non-compliance of the environmental quality criteria occurs, remedial actions
will be triggered according to the Event and Action Plan enclosed in Appendix F.
4.1.1
In the Reporting Month, air quality monitoring was
performed at all designated locations. Impact monitoring schedule provided to all relevant parties was shown in Appendix G.
4.1.2
In this Reporting Month, there were 5 sessions of 24-hour TSP and 15 sessions of 1-hour TSP undertaken
at each designated station for air quality monitoring. The air quality monitoring results are summarized in Tables 4-1 to 4-3.
The database of 24-hour TSP is shown in Appendix
H and the graphical
plots of monitoring result are shown in Appendix
I.
Table
4-1 Summary
of Air
Quality
Monitoring Results at ASR-1 under Contract 1
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st hour
measured |
2nd hour
measured |
3rd hour
measured |
||
2-May-20 |
69 |
4-May-20 |
9:16 |
59 |
64 |
62 |
8-May-20 |
55 |
9-May-20 |
13:18 |
40 |
43 |
46 |
14-May-20 |
80 |
15-May-20 |
9:24 |
62 |
67 |
63 |
20-May-20 |
35 |
21-May-20 |
9:10 |
49 |
53 |
58 |
26-May-20 |
42 |
27-May-20 |
9:15 |
78 |
76 |
75 |
Average (Range) |
56 (35
¡V 80) |
Average (Range) |
60 (40
¡V 78) |
Table
4-2 Summary
of Air
Quality
Monitoring Results at ASR-2 under Contract 2
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st hour
measured |
2nd hour
measured |
3rd hour
measured |
||
2-May-20 |
47 |
4-May-20 |
9:21 |
44 |
46 |
52 |
8-May-20 |
52 |
9-May-20 |
9:19 |
32 |
39 |
36 |
14-May-20 |
39 |
15-May-20 |
9:32 |
59 |
62 |
55 |
20-May-20 |
31 |
21-May-20 |
9:15 |
42 |
53 |
48 |
26-May-20 |
42 |
27-May-20 |
10:35 |
83 |
84 |
82 |
Average (Range) |
42 (31
¡V 52) |
Average (Range) |
54 (32
¡V 84) |
Table
4-3 Summary
of Air
Quality
Monitoring Results at ASR-3a under Contract 2
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st hour
measured |
2nd hour
measured |
3rd hour
measured |
||
2-May-20 |
34 |
4-May-20 |
9:25 |
38 |
40 |
45 |
8-May-20 |
27 |
9-May-20 |
9:26 |
28 |
31 |
30 |
14-May-20 |
20 |
15-May-20 |
9:36 |
54 |
57 |
51 |
20-May-20 |
26 |
21-May-20 |
9:21 |
63 |
54 |
58 |
26-May-20 |
21 |
27-May-20 |
10:50 |
75 |
78 |
72 |
Average (Range) |
26 (20 ¡V
34) |
Average (Range) |
52 (28
¡V 78) |
4.2.1
As
shown in Tables 4-1 to
4-3, the monitoring results of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP monitoring in the Reporting Month were below the Action/ Limit Level.
No Notification of Exceedance (NOE) of air quality monitoring criteria was issued and therefore corrective action was not required. The
meteorological data during the impact monitoring days are summarized in Appendix J.
5.1.1
In the Reporting Month, noise monitoring was performed at
all designated locations.
Impact monitoring
schedule provided to all relevant
parties
was shown in Appendix G.
5.1.2
In
this Reporting
Month, 4 sessions of noise monitoring were undertaken at each designated
noise monitoring location. The sound level were set in a free field
situation for CN1, CN2 and CN3
and therefore a façade correction of
+3dB(A) has been added according to acoustical
principles and EPD guidelines. The monitoring result of noise monitoring is show in Tables 5-1 and 5-2 and the graphical plots are shown in Appendix
I.
Table
5-1 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results under Contract 1
Construction Noise Level (Leq30min),
dB(A) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
CN1(*) |
Start Time |
CN2(*) |
4-May-20 |
15:02 |
72 |
14:24 |
66 |
15-May-20 |
11:37 |
63 |
11:00 |
66 |
21-May-20 |
13:01 |
70 |
13:38 |
64 |
27-May-20 |
9:17 |
70 |
9:55 |
68 |
Limit
Level |
75 dB(A) |
(*) A façade correction of +3dB(A) has
been added according to acoustical principles and EPD guidelines.
Table
5-2 Summary of Construction Noise Monitoring Results under Contract 2
Construction Noise Level (Leq30min),
dB(A) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
CN3 (*) |
Start Time |
CN4 |
4-May-20 |
10:18 |
59 |
10:56 |
58 |
15-May-20 |
10:20 |
58 |
9:41 |
57 |
21-May-20 |
14:20 |
58 |
14:57 |
58 |
27-May-20 |
10:37 |
61 |
11:15 |
55 |
Limit
Level |
75 dB(A) |
(*) A façade correction of +3dB(A) has
been added according to acoustical principles and EPD guidelines.
5.1.3
Prior and after noise monitoring, the accuracy of the sound level meter
has been checked by
an acoustic calibrator to
ensure the measurement within acceptance range of ¡Ó0.5dB. Moreover, wind speed checked
by portable wind speed meter has
been performed before noise monitoring. No
noise measurement was performed in fog, rain, wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m s-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m s-1.
5.1.4
According to the weather data from the Hong Kong Observatory, there was
heavy rainfall on 21 May 2020 with total rainfall of 84.6mm. Nevertheless, there was no raining in
North District during the noise monitoring in the afternoon of 21 May 2020. Therefore, the scheduled noise
monitoring was not affected.
5.2.1
As
shown in Tables 5-1 and
5-2, no Limit Level exceedance for noise monitoring exceedance was recorded in the Reporting Month. Moreover, no noise complaint (which triggered Action Level) was received. No
Notification of Exceedance (NOE) of construction noise criterion was issued and no corrective action was therefore required.
6.1.1
In the Reporting Month, water
quality monitoring was performed at all designated
locations. Impact monitoring schedule provided to all relevant
parties was shown in
Appendix G.
6.1.2
In the Reporting Month,
a total of 13 monitoring days were
carried
out for
water quality impact monitoring. The
monitoring result
of key parameters including Dissolved Oxygen, Turbidity and Suspended Solids are summarized in Tables 6-1 and 6-2. Detailed monitoring
results including in-situ measurements and laboratory analysis data are shown
in Appendix H and graphical plots for monitoring result are shown in Appendix
I.
Table
6-1 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V M3
under Contract 1
Date |
Parameters |
||
DO (Averaged) (mg/L) |
Turbidity (Averaged) (NTU) |
Suspended
Solids
(Averaged) (mg/L) |
|
2-May-20 |
6.82 |
3.7 |
5.5 |
4-May-20 |
7.13 |
2.6 |
4.5 |
6-May-20 |
6.88 |
1.8 |
4.5 |
8-May-20 |
6.62 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
11-May-20 |
6.36 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
13-May-20 |
6.30 |
1.8 |
3.5 |
15-May-20 |
6.61 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
18-May-20 |
6.96 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
20-May-20 |
6.84 |
1.9 |
4.0 |
22-May-20 |
7.72 |
1.5 |
3.0 |
25-May-20 |
6.42 |
5.4 |
4.0 |
27-May-20 |
6.48 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
29-May-20 |
6.25 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
Table
6-2 Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Results (M1, M2
and M4) under Contract 2
Date |
Parameters |
||||||||
DO (Averaged) (mg/L) |
Turbidity (Averaged) (NTU) |
Suspended
Solids
(Averaged) (mg/L) |
|||||||
M1 |
M2 |
M4 |
M1 |
M2 |
M4 |
M1 |
M2 |
M4 |
|
2-May-20 |
7.55 |
# |
7.58 |
2.1 |
# |
1.8 |
3.0 |
# |
2.5 |
4-May-20 |
7.91 |
# |
7.22 |
1.5 |
# |
1.5 |
5.5 |
# |
<2 |
6-May-20 |
7.90 |
# |
7.51 |
1.7 |
# |
1.7 |
3.0 |
# |
<2 |
8-May-20 |
6.68 |
# |
9.18 |
3.0 |
# |
1.4 |
5.5 |
# |
<2 |
11-May-20 |
6.70 |
# |
6.66 |
5.3 |
# |
1.8 |
5.5 |
# |
2.5 |
13-May-20 |
7.22 |
# |
7.62 |
5.9 |
# |
1.2 |
5.0 |
# |
<2 |
15-May-20 |
6.97 |
# |
6.61 |
4.6 |
# |
2.4 |
3.5 |
# |
2.0 |
18-May-20 |
6.85 |
# |
6.88 |
3.9 |
# |
1.9 |
5.5 |
# |
4.5 |
20-May-20 |
7.16 |
# |
7.32 |
3.6 |
# |
1.8 |
6.0 |
# |
3.5 |
22-May-20 |
8.89 |
6.88 |
7.39 |
3.8 |
62.0 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
59.5 |
3.5 |
25-May-20 |
6.77 |
5.67 |
6.83 |
4.7 |
68.5 |
1.9 |
6.5 |
54.5 |
4.5 |
27-May-20 |
6.89 |
5.26 |
6.79 |
11.4 |
81.7 |
1.8 |
10.5 |
83.0 |
2.5 |
29-May-20 |
6.24 |
5.19 |
7.06 |
4.4 |
61.7 |
2.1 |
5.0 |
67.0 |
<2 |
Remarks: (#) During the water monitoring, the channel of M2 was
observed dried up and water sampling was unable be carried out; Bold and underlined indicated Limit Level
exceedance
6.1.3
During the Reporting Month, field measurements including
temperature of stream water, salinity
concentrations, pH values and the stream
flow velocity for all monitoring locations are summarized in Table 6-3.
Table
6-3 Summary of Field Measurements for
Water Quality
Monitoring Location |
Parameters of field measurements |
|||||||
pH (Averaged) (unit) |
Salinity (Averaged) (ppt) |
Temp (Averaged) (oC) |
Water Flow (Averaged) (m/s) |
|||||
min |
max |
min |
max |
min |
max |
min |
max |
|
M1 |
7.3 |
8.6 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
24.8 |
26.6 |
<0.1 |
<0.1 |
M2 |
7.1 |
8.0 |
0.05 |
0.08 |
26.0 |
28.5 |
<0.1 |
<0.1 |
M3 |
7.2 |
8.2 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
25.1 |
28.9 |
<0.1 |
<0.1 |
M4 |
7.2 |
8.1 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
24.5 |
28.1 |
<0.1 |
<0.1 |
6.2.1
In this Reporting Month, no Action Level and Limit Level water quality exceedances was recorded.
The non-compliance of water quality performance is summarized in Table 6-4.
Table
6-4 Action and Limit (A/L) Levels Exceedance
Record
Station |
DO |
Turbidity |
SS |
Total Exceedance |
Project
Related exceedance |
|||||
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
Action |
Limit |
|
M1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
M2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
M3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
M4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6.2.2
Notification of Exceedance (NOE) and the investigation for exceedance in
the Reporting Month is
summarized in Table 6-5.
Table 6-5 Summary
of Investigation of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Month
Date of Exceedance |
Exceeded Location |
Exceeded Parameter |
Cause of Water Quality Exceedance |
22, 25, 27 and 29 May 2020 |
M2 |
Turbidity & SS |
According to
the work programme and as observed during water quality monitoring, there was
no construction activities carried out near location M2 and no discharge made
into stream was observed. According to
the weather data from HKO, there was successive rainstorm on 22, 25 and 26
May 2020, under the impact of rainstorm, the water quality of the watercourse
was highly affected by the stirred up sediment and runoff from the
surrounding environment. It was
concluded that the exceedances were related to the rainstorm and not caused
by the works under the project. |
27 May 2020 |
M1 |
Turbidity & SS |
According to
the work programme and as observed during water quality monitoring, there was
no construction activities carried out near location M1 and no discharge made
into stream was observed. According to
the weather data from HKO, there was heavy rainstorm on 26 May 2020, under
the impact of rainstorm, the water quality of the watercourse was highly
affected by the stirred up sediment and runoff from the surrounding
environment. Moreover, the measured levels of turbidity and SS
were within the range of baseline. It was concluded that
the exceedances were related to the rainstorm and not caused by the works
under the project. |
7.1.1
According
to approved EIA report (AEIAR-198/2016), habitat types within project boundary
comprise of watercourse, grassland, upland grassland, plantation, woodland and
developed area. Natural habitats were of moderate ecological value in terms of
species diversity, species rarity, species abundance, ecological linkage as
well as nursery. Moreover, 0.3ha of wet woodland on the northern side of Sandy
Ridge was deemed habitat with high ecological value. Four types of habitats were regarded as
ecologically sensitive habitats, namely wet woodland, watercourses, upland
grassland and woodland. Considering human disturbance in upcoming construction
and operation phases, ecologically sensitive habitats shall be monitored in
accordance with EM&A Manual.
7.1.2
The objective of ecologically
sensitive habitats monitoring is to evaluate the effectiveness of measures to
minimize impacts on concerned habitats from disturbance and pollution. In order
to monitor the effectiveness of the measures to the minimize impact on
ecologically sensitive habitats from disturbance and pollution, monthly
monitoring during construction and operation phases is required as specified in
EM&A Manual. Standard faunal transect and sampling surveys cover both
wetland habitats
(wet woodland and watercourse)
and non-wetland habitats (upland
grassland and woodland).
7.2.1
Wetland
habitats include wet woodland and watercourses. Monitoring surveys using
standardized quantitative methodology will conduct at fixed points. For seasonal watercourse, the survey
will be conducted whenever the habitat appears. Measures to respond to
decreases in numbers of aquatic fauna using the wetland habitats and
Action/Limit levels to trigger these measures are detailed in Table
7-1.
Table 7-1 Action and Limit Levels for Wet Woodland Habitats
Monitoring
Action
Level |
Response |
Limit
Level |
Response |
Reduction
in taxa diversity by 30% |
Investigate
cause and if cause identified as related to the project instigate remedial
action to remove or reduce source of disturbance. |
Reduction
in taxa diversity by 50% |
Investigate
cause and if cause identified as related to the project instigate remedial
action. |
Remarks:
Action and Limit Levels and Responses to Evidence of Declines in Aquatic Fauna
7.2.2
Non-wetland
habitats consist of upland grassland and woodland. Monthly quantitative surveys
of non-aquatic fauna will be conducted using standard route transect
counts. Measures to respond to
decreases in numbers of non-aquatic fauna using the non-wetland habitats and
Action/Limit levels to trigger these measures are detailed in Table
7-2.
Table 7-2 Action and Limit Levels for Non-Wet Woodland
Habitats Monitoring
Action
Level |
Response |
Limit
Level |
Response |
Reduction
in species diversity by 30% |
Investigate
cause and if cause identified as related to the project instigate remedial
action to remove or reduce source of disturbance. |
Reduction
in species diversity by 50% |
Investigate
cause and if cause identified as related to the project instigate remedial
action. |
Remarks:
Action and Limit Levels and Responses to Evidence of Declines in Non-Aquatic
Fauna
7.2.3
The ecological survey includes all taxa being
investigated in accordance with EIA report. Schedule of faunal surveys in each year
during construction phase is presented in Table 7-3.
Table 7-3 Schedule of Faunal Surveys in each year During Construction
Phase
Month |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Mammals |
Ö |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
Birds (day) |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
Birds (night) |
|
|
|
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
|
|
Herpetofauna |
|
|
|
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
|
|
Dragonflies |
|
|
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
|
|
Butterflies |
|
|
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
|
|
Aquatic fauna |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
¡Ô |
Mammal
Survey
7.2.4
Mammal surveys will be conducted along the proposed transects (shown
in Appendix D of the survey report) during both daytime and night time periods.
Along with direct observations, other field signs, such as scats and tracks,
will be searched and recorded if present.
Bird
Survey
7.2.5
Bird surveys will be conducted along the
transects (shown in Appendix D of the survey report) during the surveys, species and their vocalizing individuals
recorded will be enumerated and recorded according to the habitat(s) they are
utilizing.
Herpetofauna Survey
7.2.6
Reptile and amphibian surveys will be conducted along transects (shown
in Appendix D of the survey report) during surveys careful searches of
appropriate microhabitats and refugia for reptiles
and their vocalizing individuals will be undertaken and all reptiles observed
will be identified and counted.
Dragonfly
and Butterfly Survey
7.2.7
Dragonfly and Butterfly surveys will be conducted along transects (shown
in Appendix D of the survey report) during surveys all dragonflies and
Butterflies seen will be identified and counted as accurately as possible.
Aquatic
Fauna Survey
7.2.8
Freshwater fishes and macro-invertebrates will be recorded by
direct observation. All species trapped/recorded will be enumerated and
identified (to the lowest taxonomic level possible), and the species of
conservation importance photographed.
7.2.9
After
each ecological monitoring survey, a monthly report of the survey result and
data collected will be provided with reference to EM&A Manual. An annual
analysis of data will be carried out in order to study if there is any
significant reduction in taxa diversity and abundance.
7.3.1
In the Reporting Month,
ecological monitoring was undertaken on 12th May 2020 at work area of Contract 1. A rainy day. The
day and night survey covered wetland and non-wetland areas. The
survey was conducted by transect and at fixed points. All
species seen will be identified and counted as accurately as possible. Results of the monitoring survey are
presented below:
Monitoring
Result for Contract 1
Mammal
7.3.2
There was no
mammal recorded in the monitoring area
Birds
7.3.3
There
were total of 11 bird individuals from 7 species recorded in the monitoring
area. One species of conservation interests were recorded in
the monitoring area: Centropus sinensis, Greater Coucal (½Å¯Í¾~ÃY).
Herpetofauna
7.3.4
There was no
reptile recorded in the monitoring area. There was one amphibian species
recorded in the
monitoring area.
Butterfly
7.3.5
There
were a total of 6 butterfly
individuals from 5 species recorded in the monitoring area.
Dragonfly
7.3.6
There
was a total of 7 odonate
individual from 4 species recorded in the monitoring area. One
species of conservation interests were recorded in the monitoring area: Urothemis signata,
Scarlet Basker (¨ª´³¦±鈎¯ß»f).
Aquatic Fauna Survey (Freshwater
communities)
7.3.7
There
was no freshwater community recorded in the monitoring area.
7.3.8
The summaries
of faunal survey result
are shown in Tables 7-4 and 7-5.
Table 7-4 Result
of Faunal Survey under
Contract 1
Scientific Name |
Common / Engineer Name |
Chinese Name |
Conservation Status |
Non- wetland |
Wetland |
Mammal Survey |
|||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Avifauna Survey |
|||||
Centropus sinensis |
Greater Coucal |
½Å¯Í¾~ÃY |
Class 2 Protected Animal of China;China
Red Data Book Status: (Vulnerable) |
|
1 |
Cuculus micropterus |
Indian Cuckoo |
¥|Án§ùÃY |
|
|
1 |
Dicrurus macrocercus |
Black Drongo |
¶Â¨÷§À |
|
|
3 |
Corvus macrorhynchos |
Large-billed
Crow |
¤j¼L¯Q¾~ |
|
1 |
|
Pycnonotus jocosus |
Red-whiskered
Bulbul |
¬õ¦Õóí |
|
|
2 |
Pycnonotus aurigaster |
Sooty-headed
Bulbul |
¥Õ³ï¬õÁvóí |
|
|
2 |
Copsychus saularis |
Oriental
Magpie Robin |
ÄNì© |
|
|
1 |
Reptile Survey |
|||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Amphibian Survey |
|||||
Polypedates megacephalus |
Brown Tree Frog |
´³»Lªx¾ðµì |
|
|
+ |
Butterfly Survey |
|||||
Catochrysops strabo |
Forget-me-not |
©@¦Ç½º |
|
|
1 |
Prosotas dubiosa |
Tailless Line Blue |
ºÃªi¦Ç½º |
|
1 |
|
Spindasis lohita |
Long-banded Silverline |
»È½u¦Ç½º |
|
|
1 |
Abisara
echerius |
Plum Judy |
³D¥Ø½Å¸Ã½º |
|
|
1 |
Mycalesis mineus |
Dark Brand Bush Brown |
¤p¬Ü²´½º |
|
|
2 |
Odonate
Survey |
|||||
Aethriamanta brevipennis |
Elusive Adjutant |
µu¸¡²§»f |
|
|
1 |
Pantala flavescens |
Wandering
Glider |
¶À»f |
|
|
2 |
Rhyothemis variegata |
Variegated
Flutterer |
´³ÄR¯Í»f |
|
|
1 |
Urothemis signata |
Scarlet
Basker |
¨ª´³¦±鈎¯ß»f |
Fellowes et al. (2002): LC |
|
3 |
+: Species appeared but uncountable.
Table 7-5 Result
of Freshwater Communities Survey under Contract
1
Scientific
Name |
Common Name |
Chinese
Name |
Conservation
Status |
12-May-20 |
|
Non- wetland |
Wetland |
||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
7.4.1
In the Reporting Month,
ecological monitoring was undertaken on 12th May 2020 at work area of Contract 2. A rainy day. The
day and night survey covered wetland and non-wetland areas. The survey was
conducted by transect and at fixed point. All species seen will be identified
and counted as accurately as possible. Results
of the monitoring survey are presented below:
Monitoring
Result for Contract 2
Mammal
7.4.2
There was no mammal
recorded in the monitoring area
Birds
7.4.3
There were a total
of 10 bird individuals from 7 species recorded in the monitoring area. One
species of conservation interests was recorded in the monitoring area: Centropus bengalensis, Lesser Coucal (¤p¾~ÃY).
Herpetofauna
7.4.4
There was no
reptile recorded in the monitoring area. There was no amphibian was recorded in
the monitoring area.
Butterfly
7.4.5
There were total 3
butterfly individuals from 3 species recorded in the monitoring area.
Dragonfly
7.4.6
There was total 5 odonate individuals from
5 species recorded in the monitoring area.
Aquatic Fauna Survey (Freshwater
communities)
7.4.7
There were two
species of freshwater fish were recorded in the monitoring area.
7.4.8
The summaries
of faunal survey result
are shown in Tables 7-6 and 7-7.
Table 7-6 Result
of Faunal Survey under
Contract 2
Scientific Name |
Common / Engineer Name |
Chinese Name |
Conservation Status |
Non- wetland |
Wetland |
Mammal Survey |
|||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Avifauna Survey |
|||||
Centropus bengalensis |
Lesser Coucal |
¤p¾~ÃY |
Class 2 Protected Animal of China;China
Red Data Book Status: (Vulnerable) |
1 |
|
Hierococcyx sparverioides |
Large
Hawk Cuckoo |
¤jÆNÃY |
|
1 |
|
Pycnonotus jocosus |
Red-whiskered
Bulbul |
¬õ¦Õóí |
|
|
2 |
Prinia flaviventris |
Yellow-bellied
Prinia |
¶À¸¡økÅa |
|
|
2 |
Orthotomus sutorius |
Common
Tailorbird |
ªø§ÀÁ_¸Åa |
|
1 |
|
Garrulax perspicillatus |
Masked
Laughingthrush |
¶ÂÁy¾¸鶥 |
|
2 |
|
Copsychus saularis |
Oriental
Magpie Robin |
ÄNì© |
|
1 |
|
Reptile Survey |
|||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Amphibian Survey |
|||||
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Butterfly Survey |
|||||
Ariadne ariadne |
Angled Castor |
ªißæ½º |
|
|
1 |
Papilio helenus |
Red Helen |
¥É´³»ñ½º |
|
1 |
|
Delias pasithoe |
Red-base Jezebel |
³ø³ß´³¯»½º |
|
1 |
|
Odonate
Survey |
|||||
Ceriagrion auranticum |
Orange-tailed
Sprite |
¯[²y¾ï¶Àîe |
|
|
1 |
Copera marginipes |
Yellow Featherlegs |
¶À¯U®°îe |
|
|
1 |
Orthetrum chrysis |
Red-faced
Skimmer |
µØÄR¦Ç»f |
|
|
1 |
Orthetrum glaucum |
Common Blue
Skimmer |
¶Â§À¦Ç»f |
|
|
1 |
Trithemis aurora |
Crimson Dropwing |
¾å½Å»f |
|
|
1 |
Table 7-7 Result of Freshwater
Communities Survey under Contract 2
Scientific Name |
Common Name |
Chinese Name |
Conservation Status |
12-May-20 |
Gambusia affinis |
Mosquito fish |
¹°A³½ |
|
+ |
Puntius
semifasciolatus |
Chinese Barb |
¤½uµLŽ䰾 |
|
+ |
+: Species appeared but uncountable.
7.4.9
The
detailed survey reports of Contract 1 and Contract 2
are attached in Appendix K.
7.4.10
The tentative ecology inspection and monitoring in the next Reporting
Month (June 2020) is scheduled on 2nd June 2020.
7.5.1
Pursuant
to FEP-01/534/2017/A condition 2.19 and EP-534/2017/A condition 2.20, precautionary checks for the presence of nesting birds shall be carried out in the
breeding season (February to July) before vegetation clearance.
7.5.2
As advised by both Contractors, there were no vegetation clearance conducted within
the site in the Reporting Month and therefore precautionary check for the presence
of nesting birds was not required.
8.1.1
The EIA has recommended EM&A for landscape and visual
resources to be undertaken during the design, construction and operational
stages of the project. The design, implementation and maintenance of landscape
mitigation measures is a key aspect of this and should be checked to ensure
that they are fully realized and that potential conflicts between the proposed
landscape measures and any other project works let its are resolved at the
earliest possible date and without compromise to the intention of the
mitigation measures. In addition, implementation of the mitigation measures
recommended by the EIA will be monitored through the site audit programme.
8.1.2
A number of mitigation measures to ameliorate the landscape and
visual impacts of the Project implementation is
summarized in the EMIS of Appendix 13.1 of the EIA Report.
8.1.3
The landscape and visual
mitigation measures proposed should be incorporated in the landscape and
engineering design. Mitigation
measures to be implemented during construction should be adopted from the start
of construction and be in place throughout the entire construction period. Mitigation measures to be implemented
during operation should be integrated into the detailed design and built as
part of the construction works so that they are in place on commissioning of
the Project. Tree transplantation
and compensatory planting should be carried out as early as possible in the
Project with transplantation carried
out prior to construction starting in any particular area.
8.1.4
During
construction phase, Landscape & Visual Monitoring of the contractor¡¦s operations should be conducted monthly and
reported by ET, and countersigned by IEC.
8.2.1
In the Reporting Month, landscape & Visual inspection was carried
out by the Registered Landscape Architect (RLA) for works area of Contract 1 and
Contract 2 on 27th May 2020. The findings / reminders recorded
during the inspection are presented in Tables 8-1 and 8-2.
Table 8-1 Landscape
& Visual Inspection Finding for Contract 1
Date |
Findings and Reminder |
Follow-Up Status |
27th
May 2020 |
1. The
Contractor was reminded to prevent the construction material pile within TPZ
and ensure no works is allowed within the TPZ. |
• Reminder
was noted by the Contractor. |
2. Transplanted tree T2465, T2468 and T2928 were
in fair health condition with normal foliage color and density. The
Contractor is reminded to provide proper maintenance according to approved method
statement. |
• Reminder
was noted by the Contractor. |
Table 8-2 Landscape
& Visual Inspection Finding for Contract 2
Date |
Findings and Reminder |
Follow-Up Status |
27th
May 2020 |
1. The
Contractor is reminded to prevent the construction material pile within TPZ
and ensure no works is allowed within the TPZ. |
•
Reminder was noted by the Contractor. |
|
2. Proper
TPZ should be set up according to approved method statement. |
•
Reminder was noted by the Contractor. |
8.2.2
Inspection checklist of Landscape & Visual signed by RLA is attached in Appendix L.
9.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an on-site Environmental
Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time in accordance with the
Waste Management Plan (WMP).
9.2.1
All
types of waste arising from the construction work are classified into the
following:
l Construction & Demolition (C&D)
Material;
l Chemical Waste;
l General Refuse; and
l Excavated Soil.
9.2.2
The
quantities of waste for disposal in this Reporting Month are summarized in Table 9-1 and 9-2 and
the Monthly Summary Waste Flow Table is shown in
Appendix M. Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable.
Table 9-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Contract 1 |
Contract 2 |
||
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
|
C&D
Materials (Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
-- |
934.540 (#) |
-- |
Reused
in this Contract (Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
9.383 |
Within Contract area |
0 |
-- |
Reused
in other Projects (Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
Disposal
as Public Fill (Inert) (¡¥000m3) |
0.540 |
Tuen Mun Area 38 |
934.540 (#) |
Tuen Mun Area 38 |
Remark:
the unit is ¡¥000kg
Table 9-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Contract 1 |
Contract 2 |
||
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
|
Recycled
Metal (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
Recycled Paper / Cardboard Packing (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
Recycled Plastic (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
Chemical Wastes (¡¥000kg) |
0 |
-- |
0 |
-- |
General Refuses (¡¥000m3) |
0.052 |
NENT Landfill |
5.160 (#) |
NENT Landfill |
Remark:
the unit is ¡¥000kg
9.2.3
Since
canteen and/or kitchen are not allowed setting on the Project site,
no domestic wastewater was generated
from the Project.
10.1.1
According
to the approved EM&A
Manual, environmental site inspection should be led by RE and attended by the Contractor and ET at least once per week. Regular environmental site inspections shall
be carried out to assess the environmental performance.
Contract 1
10.2.1
In the Reporting Month, joint site inspections for Contract 1 to evaluate the site environmental performance were carried out by the RE, ET and the Contractor on 7th
, 14th, 21st and 28th May 2020 and IEC attended joint site inspection on 14th May 2020. No non-compliance
was noted.
10.2.2
The findings / deficiencies that observed during the weekly site
inspection are listed in Table 10-1.
Table 10-1 Site Observations
for the Works of Contract 1
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
7th May 2020 |
Free
standing chemical containers was observed at FS3. The Contractor was advised
to provide proper mitigation measure to prevent land contamination. |
The
chemical containers were removed from site. |
|
Water
spraying should be provided at FS3. |
Reminder
only |
14th May 2020 |
The
Contractor was reminded to provide water spraying on site regularly. |
Reminder
only |
21st May 2020 |
The Contractor was reminded to remove the free standing chemical
container at FS1. |
Reminder
only |
28th May 2020 |
The
Contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant water inside the drip tray at
Sha Ling |
Reminder
only |
|
The
Contractor was reminded to provide water treatment plant at Drop Off and Pick
Up point. |
Reminder
only |
Contract 2
10.2.3
In the Reporting Month, joint site inspections for Contract 2 to evaluate the site environmental performance carried out by the
RE, ET and the Contractor was on 7th , 14th, 21st
and 28th May 2020
and IEC attended joint site inspection on 14th May 2020. No
non-compliance was noted.
10.2.4
The findings / deficiencies that observed during the weekly site
inspection are listed in Table 10-2.
Table 10-2 Site
Observations for the Works of Contract 2
Date |
Findings / Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
7th May 2020 |
The Contractor was reminded
to remove free standing chemical container at C225 |
Reminder only |
14th May
2020 |
The Contractor should remove
the accumulated sediment in drip tray under generator and air compressor to
ensure any chemical leaked will be well-contained. |
Accumulated sediment in drip
tray under generator and air compressor was removed. |
Full waste skip was observed.
The Contractor should dispose the waste stored on site regularly. (RW14) |
Waste was disposed. |
|
Free standing chemical
container should be placed into drip tray to avoid any land contamination.
(CS20) |
Free standing chemical
container was removed. |
|
The Contractor was reminded
to ensure all surface runoff should be properly treated prior
discharge.(Slope C231) |
Reminder only |
|
The Contractor was reminded
to avoid storage of construction materials near plantation area. |
Reminder only |
|
21st May
2020 |
Improper color of NRMM label
of excavator was observed at RW14. The Contractor was advised to provide
proper NRMM label for the excavator. |
Proper NRMM label was
provided for the excavator. |
|
The Contractor was reminded
to close the door of air compressor at RW14. |
Reminder only |
28th May
2020 |
No adverse environmental
issue was observed. |
NA |
11.1.1
In
the Reporting Month,
no
environmental complaint was
received for the Project. No summons and prosecution
was lodged for the Contract.
The
statistical summary table of the environmental complaint, summons and
prosecution are presented in Tables 11-1, 11-2 and 11-3.
Table
11-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Reporting Month |
Environmental Complaint
Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table 11-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Reporting Month |
Environmental Summons
Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table 11-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Reporting Month |
Environmental Prosecution
Statistics |
|||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
||
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 1 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 ¡V 31 May 2020 |
Contract 2 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
11.1.2
In addition, no complaints received and emergency
events relating to violation of environmental legislation for illegal dumping and landfilling
were received.
12.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that recommended in the
Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (ISEMM) in the
approved EM&A Manual covered the issues of dust, noise, water and waste and
they are summarized presented in Appendix N.
12.1.2
The Works of Contract 1
and Contract 2 under the Project shall be
implementing the required environmental mitigation measures according to the
approved EM&A Manual subject to the site condition. Environmental mitigation measures implemented
in this Reporting Month is summarized in Table 12-1.
Table 12-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Water
Quality |
¡P
Provided efficient silt removal facilities to reduce SS level before effluent discharge. ¡P
Provided ditches, earth bunds or sand bag
barriers to minimize polluted runoff. ¡P
Temporary drainage was provided
to prevent runoff going through site surface
and minimize polluted runoff. ¡P
Provided perimeter cut-off drains at site
boundaries to intercept storm runoff from crossing the site. ¡P
Exposed slopes surface were compacted and covered with tarpaulin or similar means. ¡P
Provided portable chemical toilets on site. |
Air
Quality |
¡P
Maintain damp /
wet surface on access road. ¡P
Maintain low vehicular speed within the works areas. ¡P
Provided vehicle wheel washing facilities at each
construction site exit; ¡P
Provided water spraying for all active works area. ¡P
Stockpiles
of dusty material were covered
with impervious sheeting. ¡P
Provided workers to clear dusty materials at the vehicle
entrance or exit regularly. ¡P
Stockpile more
than 20 bags of cement or dry pulverized fuel ash (PFA) has been covered entirely by impervious sheeting or placed in
an area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides. |
Noise |
¡P
Restricted operation time of plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on
any working day except for Public Holiday and Sunday. ¡P
Keep good
maintenance of plants ¡P
Placed noisy plants away from residence and school ¡P
Provided noise barriers or hoarding to enclose the noisy
plants or works ¡P
Shut down the
plants when not in used. |
Waste
and Chemical Management |
¡P
Provided on-site sorting prior to disposal ¡P
Followed requirements and procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket
System¡¨ ¡P
Predicted required quantity of concrete accurately ¡P
Collected the unused fresh concrete at designated
locations in the sites for subsequent disposal |
General |
¡P
The site was
generally kept tidy and clean. |
12.2.1 According to the information provided by HCTYJV, the
forthcoming construction activities for Contract 1
are listed below:
(i)
General
Site Housekeeping
(ii)
Bulk
Excavation
(iii)
Construction
of Cut Slope, installation of soil nailing and construction of surface channel.
(iv)
Construction
of Fill
Slope and surface channel
(v)
Construction of Pick-up and Drop-off Point near Man
Kam To Road
(vi)
Construction
of sewer and storm drain
12.2.2 According to the information provided by Sang
Hing, the forthcoming construction activities for Contract 2
are listed below:
Construction of Manhole, gullies, drainage pipe at
Lin Ma Hang Road between CH480-505 Northbound & CH1265-1365 Northbound.
Man Kam To Road DN800 DI Sewerage Pipe
FM4.19-FM4.22 (100m)
Filling works for slope FS18 (Part A1) & backfilling
of Retaining Wall 13
Piling Works for Retaining Wall 14
Temporary Soil Nail Works for Retaining Wall 12
Soil Nail Works at Lin Ma Hang Road Slope C225
& C231
12.3.1
Key
issues to be considered in the coming month for the works of Contract 1 include:
Implementation of control measures for
rainstorm;
Regular clearance of stagnant water during
wet season;
Implementation of dust suppression measures
at all times;
Potential wastewater quality impact due to
surface runoff;
Potential fugitive dust quality impact due
from the dry/loose/exposure soil surface/dusty material;
Ensure dust suppression measures are
implemented properly;
Sediment catch-pits and silt removal
facilities should be regularly maintained;
Discharge of site effluent to the nearby
wetland is prohibited;
Nearby wetland prohibited stockpiling
and/or disposal of materials;
Follow-up of improvement on general waste
management issues; and
Implementation of construction noise
preventative control measures.
12.3.2
Since wet season is approaching, the
Contractors are reminded to pay special attention on water quality
mitigation measures and should fully
implement the measures as
recommended in the EM&A Manual, in particular to prevent surface runoff and other pollutants
from flowing to local stream and Conservation Area. The implementation of water quality mitigation
measures conducted by the Contractors is shown in Appendix O.
13.1.1
This
is the 22nd Monthly EM&A Report presenting the
monitoring results and inspection findings for the period of 1st to 31st May 2020.
13.1.2
No
24-hour or 1-hour TSP monitoring result that triggered the Action or Limit
Levels was
recorded. No NOEs or the associated
corrective action was therefore required.
13.1.3
No noise
complaint (which is an Action Level exceedance) was received and no construction
noise measurement result that exceeded the Limit Level was recorded in this Reporting Month. No NOEs or the associated corrective actions
were therefore issued.
13.1.4
In the Reporting Period, 10 Limit Level water quality exceedances were
recorded. NOE were issued to relevant parties and the investigation has been
conducted by ET. Investigation revealed that the Contractor had implemented
water quality mitigation measures and the exceedances were related the
rainstorm and not caused by the work under the project.
13.1.5
Monthly ecological
monitoring for
sensitive habitat for area of Contract 1 and Contract 2 were undertaken on 12th
May 2020. As advised by both Contractors, there were no vegetation clearance conducted within
the site in the Reporting Month and therefore precautionary check for the presence
of nesting birds was not required.
13.1.6
Landscape and visual inspection at both Contracts were undertaken by the RLA on 27th May
2020. The Contractor was reminded to prevent the
construction material pile within TPZ and ensure no works is allowed within the
TPZ.
13.1.7
In the Reporting Month, no environmental complaint, summons and prosecution was received. In addition, no complaints received and emergency events relating to
violation of environmental legislation for illegal dumping and landfilling
were received.
13.1.8
In the Reporting Month, joint site inspections for Contract 1 to evaluate the site environmental performance were carried out by the RE, ET and the Contractor on 7th,
14th, 21st and 28th May 2020 and IEC attended joint site inspection on 14h May 2020. No non-compliance
was noted.
13.1.9
Joint site inspections for Contract 2 to evaluate the site environmental performance carried out by the
RE, ET and the Contractor was on 7th, 14th, 21st and 28th
May 2020
and IEC attended joint site inspection on 14h May 2020. No non-compliance was
noted.
13.2.1 The
Contractors are reminded to pay special attention on water quality mitigation
measures and should fully implement the measures as recommended in the EM&A
Manual, in particular to prevent surface runoff and other pollutants from
flowing to local stream and Conservation Area.
13.2.2 Air quality mitigation measures such as
wheel wash facilities, watering of haul roads, loose soil construction surface and
covering of dusty materials with tarpaulin sheet should be implemented as far
as practicable.
13.2.3
Construction
noise would be a key environmental issue during construction phase of the Project. Noise mitigation measures such as using
quiet plants and mobile noise barriers should be implemented in accordance with
the EM&A requirement.
13.2.4
Since some of the construction site
under the Project is located near villages, both Contractors should
fully implement air quality mitigation measures to reduce construction dust
emission.
13.2.5 Furthermore, daily cleaning and weekly tidiness
shall be properly performed and maintained. In addition, mosquito control should be performed to prevent mosquito
breeding on site.