|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Job No.: TCS00881/18 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
CEDD
Contract CV/2016/10 Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium
at Sandy Ridge Cemetery |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report (No.3) ¡V October 2018 |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared For |
|
|
||
|
|
Hsin Chong Tsun Yip Joint Venture |
|
|
||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
14 November 2018 |
TCS00881/18/600/R189v2 |
|
|
Nicola Hon (Environmental Consultant) |
Tam Tak Wing (Environmental Team
Leader) |
Version |
Date |
Remarks |
1 |
6 November
2018 |
First Submission |
2 |
14 November
2018 |
Amended according to the IEC¡¦s comment 12
November 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
executive summary
ES.01.
Civil Engineering
and Development Department (hereafter referred as ¡§CEDD¡¨) is the Project
Proponent for the Project
¡§Site Formation and Associated
Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery¡¨ (hereafter referred as ¡§the
Project¡¨). The Project is a Designated Project to be implemented under
Environmental Permit No. EP-534/2017. To facilitate the Project management, the Project works were separated into three different Contracts and they
are listed below.
CEDD Contract No.
CV/2016/10 - Site Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for
Development of Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 1¡¨)
CEDD Contract No.
CV/2017/02 - Infrastructural Works at Man Kam To Road and Lin Ma Hang Road for Development
of Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 2¡¨)
Other CEDD¡¦s Contract as related Development of Columbarium at
Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 3¡¨)
ES.02.
Hsin Chong Tsun Yip
Joint Venture (hereafter referred as ¡§HCTYJV¡¨) has
been awarded the CEDD Contract No. CV/2016/10 ¡§Site Formation and Associated
Infrastructural Works for Development of
Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery¡¨ on 5 December 2017. According to the Contract requirement,
HCTYJV shall
take over the
responsibility for part of the Environmental Permit No.
EP-534/2017 for
ease of management, therefore application for
Further Environmental Permit was submitted by HCTYJV to EPD on 26 January 2018 and Further Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/534/2017
was granted to
HCTYJV by EPD on
23 February 2018.
ES.03.
Action-United
Environmental Services & Consulting (hereinafter
referred as ¡§AUES¡¨) has been commissioned by HCTYJV as an Environmental
Team (hereinafter referred as ¡§the ET¡¨) to implement the Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A) programme in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual as well as
the associated duties.
ES.04.
As notified by HCTYJV, construction works of the Contract 1
was commenced on 16 August
2018
and therefore construction phase
impact monitoring was started on 16 August 2018.
ES.05.
This
is the 3rd
monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report to reporting the
monitoring results and inspection findings for the period from 1 to 31 October 2018 (the Reporting Month).
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Activities
ES.06.
Environmental
monitoring activities under the EM&A program in this Reporting Month is
summarized in the following table.
Table ES-4 Environmental monitoring activities in the
Reporting Period
Issues |
Environmental Monitoring Parameters /
Inspection |
Monitoring Location
under CV/2016/10 |
Occasions |
Air
Quality |
1-hour
TSP |
ASR-1 |
15 |
24-hour TSP |
ASR-1 |
6 |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq
(30min) Daytime |
CN-1 |
4 |
Water
Quality |
In-situ
measurement and Water sampling |
M3 |
14 |
Ecology |
Monthly Monitoring |
Transect within site area of CV/2016/10 |
1 |
Landscape
& Visual |
Monthly Site Inspection |
Site area of CV/2016/10 |
1 |
Inspection
/ Audit |
ET
Regular Environmental Site Inspection |
Site area of CV/2016/10 |
5 |
IEC
Monthly Environmental Site Audit |
Site area of CV/2016/10 |
1 |
Breach of Action and Limit (A/L) Levels
ES.07.
No
exceedance of air quality and construction noise monitoring was recorded
in this Reporting Month. However, four
(4) Limit Level exceedances were recorded in water quality monitoring. Notification of Exceedance (NOE) of
water quality was issued. The statistics of environmental
exceedance, NOE issued and investigation of exceedance are summarized in the
following table.
Table ES-5 Breach
of Action and Limit (A/L) Levels in the Reporting Period
Environmental Issues |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit
Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation findings |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air
Quality |
1-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
24-hour
TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
|
Construction Noise |
Leq30min
Daytime |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
Water Quality |
DO |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
- |
Turbidity |
0 |
3 |
3 |
Not related to the
Contract Works |
NA |
|
SS |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Not related to
the Contract Works |
NA |
Note: NOE
¡V Notification of Exceedance
ES.08.
Investigation
for the cause of water quality exceedances have been undertaken by ET. Investigation
results revealed that water quality mitigation
measures have been implemented to minimize the water quality impact arising
from contract works. Such as temporary bund and de-silting trench were installed at Retaining Wall
RW1 to reduce the suspended solids content in runoff. Series of sheet pile was installed at
site boundary to prevent site runoff flowing to the Conservation Area (CA). In
view of the implementation of water quality mitigation measures, the site was generally
order and no water quality impact was observed, it is considered that the exceedances were unlikely caused by the works under the Project.
ES.09.
No
environmental complaint was recorded or received in this Reporting Month. The statistics of environmental
complaint are summarized in the following table.
Table ES-6 Environmental
Complaint Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Period |
Environmental Complaint Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
0 |
0 |
NA |
ES.010. In addition, no complaints
received and emergency events relating to violation of environmental legislation for illegal
dumping and landfilling were received.
Notification of
Summons and Successful Prosecutions
ES.011.
No
environmental summons or successful prosecution was recorded in this Reporting Month. The statistics of summons or successful
prosecutions are summarized in the following tables.
Table ES-7 Environmental
Summons Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Period |
Environmental Summons Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
1 ¡V 31 October 2018 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table ES-8 Environmental
Prosecution Summaries in the Reporting Month
Reporting Period |
Environmental Prosecution Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
1 ¡V 31 October 2018 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
ES.012.
There were no reporting changes in the Reporting Month.
Site Inspection
ES.013. In this Reporting Period, joint site inspections to evaluate the site environmental performance at Contract 1 have been carried out by the RE, ET and
the Contractor on
4th, 11th, 19th, 25th and 31st
October 2018. No non-compliance was noted during the
site inspection. Furthermore, IEC attended a joint site inspection on 19th October
2018.
ES.014. The Contractors should pay special attention on water quality
mitigation measures and fully implement according to the ISEMM
of the EM&A Manual, in particular in rainy season to prevent surface runoff
with high SS content and other pollutants from flowing to local stream and
Conservation Area (CA).
ES.015.
Moreover,
air quality and construction noise are the major environmental issues as under
the Project Works. Air quality mitigation measures such as wheel
wash facilities, watering of haul roads and covering of dusty materials with
tarpaulin sheet should be implemented as far as practicable. Construction noise
mitigation measures such as use of movable noise barriers and Quality Powered
Mechanical Equipment (QPME) should be properly provided to
reduce construction noise impact.
ES.016.
Furthermore,
daily cleaning and weekly tidiness shall be properly performed and maintained.
In addition, mosquito
control should be performed to prevent mosquito breeding on site.
Table of Contents
2 Organization
and Construction progress of the Works Contract-1
2.1 Works
Contract-1 Organization and Management Structure
2.3 Summary of Environmental Submissions
2.4 Summary of Submission Under the Environmental Permit Requirements
3 Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirement
3.4 Monitoring
Frequency and Period
3.7 Data
Management and Data QA/QC Control
3.8 Determination
of Action/Limit (A/L) Levels
5.2 Noise
Monitoring Exceedance
6.2 Water
Quality Monitoring Exceedance
7.3 Ecological
Monitoring Survey Findings
8.2 Findings
/ Deficiencies During Site Inspection in the Reporting Month
9.2 Records
of Waste Quantities
10.2 Findings
/ Deficiencies During Site Inspection in the Reporting Month
11 Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
11.1 Environmental
Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
12 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
12.2 Tentative
Construction Activities in the Coming Month
12.3 Key
Issues for the Coming Month
13 Conclusions
and Recommentations
List of TABLES
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits
Table 2-2 Status
of Submission as under EP and/or FEP Stipulation
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Table 3-2 Designated
Air Quality Monitoring Location under the Project
Table 3-3 Air
Quality Monitoring Location as Related the Works Contract-1
Table 3-4 Designated
Construction Noise Monitoring Location under the Project
Table 3-5 Noise
Monitoring Location as Related the Works Contract-1
Table 3-6 Designated
Water Quality Monitoring Stations under the Project
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Station as Related the Works Contract-1
Table 3-8 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-9 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-10 Water Quality
Monitoring Equipment
Table 3-11 Action and Limit
Levels for Air Quality Monitoring
Table 3-12 Action and Limit
Levels for Construction Noise
Table 3-13 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Table 4-1 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results at ASR-1
Table 5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results, dB(A)
Table 6-1 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V M3
Table 6-2 Action
and Limit (A/L) Levels Exceedance Record
Table 6-3 Summary
of Investigation Finding of Water Quality Exceedance in the Reporting Period
Table 7-1 Action
and Limit Levels for Wet Woodland Habitats Monitoring
Table 7-2 Action
and Limit Levels for Non-Wet Woodland Habitats Monitoring
Table 7-3 Schedule
of Faunal Surveys in each year During Construction Phase
Table 7-4 Result
of Avifauna Survey
Table 7-5 Result
of Reptile Survey
Table 7-6 Result
of Amphibian Survey
Table 7-7 Result
of Butterfly Survey
Table 7-8 Result
of Odonate Survey
Table 7-9 Result
of Freshwater Communities Survey
Table 9-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 9-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 10-1 Site Observations
for the Works of Contract 1
Table 11-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Table 11-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Table 11-3 Statistical Summary
of Environmental Prosecution
Table 12-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
List
of Appendices
Appendix A Layout
Plan of the Project
Appendix B Organization
Structure and Contact Details of Relevant Parties
Appendix C Three
Months rolling Programme
Appendix D Designated
Monitoring Locations as Recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual
Appendix E Calibration
Certificates of MONITORING EQUIPMENT and Laboratory Certificate
Appendix F Event
and Action Plan of Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality
Appendix G Monitoring
Schedules of the Reporting Month and Coming Month
Appendix H Monitoring
Data of 24-Hour TSP Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality
Appendix I Graphical
Plots of Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality
Appendix J Meteorological
Data of the Reporting Period
Appendix K Ecology
Survey Report
Appendix L Landscape
& Visual Inspection Checklist
Appendix M Monthly
Summary Waste Flow Table
Appendix N Implementation
Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (ISEMM)
1.1.1
Civil Engineering
and Development Department is the Project Proponent for the Project ¡§Site Formation and Associated
Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium, Crematorium and Related
Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery¡¨ (hereafter referred as ¡§the
Project¡¨). The Project is a Designated Project to be implemented under Environmental Permit No. EP-534/2017. The layout plan of the Project is shown in Appendix
A. To facilitate the Project management, the Project works were separated into three different Contracts which are
described below sub-sections.
1.1.2
Contract No. CV/2016/10 - Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium
at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 1¡¨):-
Site formation of about 1.77 ha of land for the proposed pick-up
and drop-off area for shuttle bus operation;
Upgrading of a section of 900m existing Sha Ling Road from 3m wide
carriageway to 7.3m wide carriageway with footpath at both sides;
Construction of one EVA with a total length of about 160m;
Construction of noise barriers along Sha Ling Road;
Modification of junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling
Road;
Construction of a new pick up / drop off point at Man Kam To Road;
Relocation and construction of a new refuse collection point near
junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling Road;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures;
Associated drainage, sewerage and waterworks along Sha Ling Road;
and
Associated landscaping works.
1.1.3
Contract
No. CV/2017/02 - Infrastructural Works at Man Kam To Road and Lin Ma Hang Road
for Development of Columbarium at Sandy Ridge Cemetery (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 2¡¨):-
Construction of a new road connecting Columbarium site to
Crematorium site;
Construction of one EVA with a total length of about 300m;
Widening of a section of 1.4 km long Lin Ma Hang Road (between Man
Kam To Road and Ping Yuen River) from 6m wide carriageway to 7.3m with 2m width
footpath on both sides;
Provision of a pair of lay-by at Lin Ma Hang Road;
Construction of a new vehicular access connecting the Sheung Shui Landmark North PTI
and Lung Sum Avenue;
Construction of covered walkway along Fanling Station Road;
Removal of planters and central divider along Fanling Station Road
and San Wan Road;
Associated drainage, sewerage, waterworks and utility works along
Man Kam To Road and Lin Ma Hang Road;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures; and
Associated landscaping works.
1.1.4
CEDD
Contract No. (to be advised) (hereafter referred as ¡§Contract 3¡¨):-
Site Formation for the platform of the columbarium site;
Construction of two 2 at-grade access roads;
Construction of road junction between Man Kam To Road and the new
access road;
Associated drainage, sewerage and waterworks along the two new
access roads;
Associated geotechnical works including cut and fill slopes, soil
nailing works and retaining structures; and
Associated landscaping works
1.1.5
Hsin Chong Tsun
Yip Joint Venture (hereinafter ¡§HCTYJV¡¨) has been awarded the Works Contract 1 on 5 December 2017. According to the Contract requirement,
HCTYJV
shall take over
the responsibility for part of Environmental
Permit No. EP-534/2017 for ease of management, therefore application for Further Environmental Permit was submitted by HCTYJV to EPD on 26 January 2018 and Further Environmental Permit No. FEP-01/534/2017
was granted to HCTYJV by EPD on 23 February 2018. Major works to
be executed under the Project shall include to the following:
A Designated Works under EP-534/2017
(i)
Site formation of about 8 hectares of
land and associated drainage, sewerage and landscape works for development of
Columbarium and Crematorium facilities at the Sandy Ridge Cemetery;
(ii)
Construction of a new road (about 600m)
including a section of viaduct connecting the platform for Crematorium and Man
Kam To Road and the pick-up/drop-off point at Man Kam To Road.;
(iii)
Widening of about 900m of the existing
Sha Ling Road;
(iv)
Widening of about 1.4km of the existing
Lin Ma Hang Road; and
(v)
Improvement works to the existing
barging point at Siu Lam
Non-Designated Works
(i)
Construction of a sewage detention tank
complete with odour and septicity control mechanism;
(ii)
Construction of noise barriers along Sha
Ling Road;
(iii)
Construction of a new Refuse Collection
Point (RCP) near the junction between Man Kam To Road and Sha Ling Road;
(iv)
Landscaping works (including both hard
and soft landscape works);
(v)
Associated tree felling, transplanting
and compensatory planting works;
(vi)
Associated street lighting, street
furniture and road marking, etc.; and
(vii) Other
works which are specified in PS of the Contract.
1.1.6
Action-United
Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned by HCTYJV as an Environmental
Team to implement the EM&A programme in accordance with the approved
EM&A Manual as well as the associated duties.
As part of the EM&A programme, baseline
monitoring to determine the ambient environmental conditions was completed before construction work commencement. The Baseline Monitoring Report (air, noise and water) certified
by Environmental Team Leader (ETL) and verified by Independent Environmental
Checker (IEC) was submitted to Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and it
was approved by EPD on 25 October 2018.
1.1.7
This
is the 3rd
monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit Report to reporting the
monitoring results and inspection findings for the period from 1 to 31 October 2018.
1.2.1
The
Monthly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report is structured into
the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Project Organization and Construction Progress
Section 3 Summary of Monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air Quality Monitoring Results
Section 5 Noise Monitoring Results
Section 6 Water Quality Monitoring Results
Section 7 Ecology Monitoring Results
Section 8 Landscape & Visual
Section 9 Waste Management
Section 10 Site Inspections
Section 11 Environmental Complaints and Non-Compliance
Section 12 Implementation Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 13 Conclusions and Recommendation
2.1.1
Organization
structure and contact details of relevant parties with respect to on-site
environmental management are shown in Appendix B.
2.1.2
The
three month rolling construction programme are enclosed in Appendix C
and the major construction activities undertaken in this Reporting Month are
listed below:-
l General site clearance;
l Bulk Excavation
l Construction of temporary Site Office;
l Construction of Cut Slope,
installation of soil nailing and construction of surface channel;
l Construction of retaining wall; and
l Construction of fill
slope.
2.1.3
Summary of the relevant permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental protection
for this Project in this Reporting Month is presented in Table 2-1.
Table
2-1 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits
Item |
Description |
License/ Permit ref
no. |
License/ Permit Status |
1 |
Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Ref. no. 428909 Acknowledged by EPD on 20/12/2017 |
Valid |
2 |
Chemical
waste Producer Registration |
WPN:
5231-641-H3937-01 Issued by EPD on 27/03/2018 |
Valid |
3 |
Water
Pollution Control Ordinance |
License no. WT00030795-2018 Issued
date: 9/5/2018 Expire
Date: 31/5/2023 |
Valid |
4 |
Billing
Account for Disposal of Construction Waste |
Account
no.: 7029769 Date
approved: NA |
Valid |
5 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN0490-18 Issued
date: 14/9/2018 Expire
Date: 18/11/2018 |
Valid |
2.1.4
Table 2-2 summarized
the submission status under the EP and/or FEP stipulation in the Reporting
Month.
Table
2-2 Status of Submission as under EP and/or FEP Stipulation
Item |
EP and / or FEP
Stipulation |
Description |
Situation |
1 |
Condition 2.10 of the EP and FEP |
Management organization of : i) the main
construction companies; ii) ET; and iii) IEC and the supporting team |
Submitted on 11 April
2018 |
2 |
Condition 2.11 of the EP and FEP |
i) Detailed phasing programme of all construction works;
and ii) Location plan of all construction works |
Submitted on 12 April
2018 |
3 |
Condition 2.13 of
EP and Condition 2.12 of
FEP |
Contamination
Assessment Plan (CAP) |
Submitted on 11
Oct 2018 |
4 |
Condition 2.14 of EP and Condition 2.13 of FEP |
Grassland Reinstatement Plan |
Submitted on 28 May 2018 |
5 |
Condition 2.15 of EP and Condition 2.14 of FEP |
Vegetation Survey
Report |
Approved by EPD on 12 Oct 2018 |
6 |
Condition 2.16 of EP and Condition 2.15 of FEP |
Vegetation Transplantation Proposal |
Approved by EPD on 12 Oct 2018 |
7 |
Condition 2.18 of EP and Condition 2.17 of FEP |
Woodland
Compensation Plan |
Submitted on 15 May 2018 |
8 |
Condition 2.19 of EP and Condition 2.18 of FEP |
Monitoring and Survey
Plan for Golden-headed Cisticola |
Submitted on 9 May 2018 |
9 |
Condition 2.22 of EP and Condition 2.20 of FEP |
Landscape
& Visual Mitigation and Tree Preservation Plan(s) |
Submitted on 18 May 2018 |
10 |
Condition 2.24 of EP and Condition 2.22 of FEP |
Traffic Noise
Mitigation Plan |
Submitted on 17 July 2018 |
11 |
Condition 3.3 of the EP and FEP |
Baseline Monitoring
Report (Air, Noise and Water) |
Approved by EPD on 25 Oct 2018 |
12 |
Condition 4.2 of the EP and FEP |
The Contract Internet website |
Internet website address has notified EPD on 15 Jun 2018 |
3.1.1
The Environmental Monitoring and Audit requirements are set out in
the Approved EM&A Manual. Environmental issues such as air quality,
construction noise, water quality and ecology were identified as the key issues
during the construction phase of the Project.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The EM&A impact monitoring shall cover the following
environmental aspect:
•
Air quality;
•
Construction noise;
•
Water quality; and
•
Ecology
3.2.2
A summary of the monitoring parameters is presented in Table
3-1 below
Table 3-1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Issue |
Parameters |
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP; 24-hour TSP |
Noise |
Leq(30min) during normal working hours.; and
Leq(15min) during the construction works is undertaken in
Restricted Hours |
Water Quality |
In-situ
Measurements Dissolved Oxygen
Concentration (mg/L) & Saturation (% ); Temperature (¢J); Turbidity (NTU); Salinity
(ppm) pH unit; Water depth (m); and Stream
Flow Velocity (m/sec). |
Laboratory Analysis Suspended Solids (mg/L) |
|
Ecology |
Ecologically sensitive habitats
(wetland habitats and non-wetland habitats) |
3.3.1
According to the Approved
EM&A Manual of the Project - Site
Formation and Associated Infrastructural Works for Development of Columbarium,
Crematorium and Related Facilities at Sandy Ridge Cemetery, the designated monitoring locations for air
quality, noise, water quality and ecology under the monitoring programme, is shown in Appendix D.
3.3.2
Since the Project was divided
into three Works Contracts and all Contracts will be
commenced at different time, the
construction phase impact monitoring will only be performed at the
Contract-related monitoring stations upon commencement of each
Contract Works.
Air Quality
3.3.3
There were three (3) air quality
monitoring
stations / air quality sensitive receivers (ASR) recommended in the Approved EM&A Manual Section 5.6.1.1.
The designated air quality monitoring locations were listed in Table 3-2 and illustrated in Appendix D.
Table 3-2 Designated
Air Quality Monitoring Location under the Project
Location
ID |
ASR ID in EIA |
Description |
Location |
ASR-1 |
A1 |
Village House along Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling
Village House No.6 |
ASR-2 |
A2 |
Village
House at San Uk Ling |
San Uk Ling Village House No.1 |
ASR-3 |
A3 |
Village House at Muk Wu Nga
Yiu |
Muk Wu Nga Yiu House No.28 |
3.3.4
Based on rationale in Section 3.3.2, the Contract-related air quality monitoring location under construction
phase of Contract 1 is shown in Table 3-3.
Table 3-3 Air Quality Monitoring Location as
Related the Works Contract-1
Location
ID |
ASR ID in EIA |
Description |
Location |
ASR-1 |
A1 |
Village
House along Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling Village
House No.6 |
3.3.5
If the designated monitoring location
is required to relocate, alternative monitoring location shall meet the following criteria:
i)
Be at the site
boundary or such locations close to the major dust emission source;
ii)
Close to the sensitive receptors;
iii)
Take into account the prevailing
meteorological conditions;
iv)
For monitoring location located in the
vicinity of the ASRs, care shall be taken to cause minimal disturbance to the
occupants during monitoring.
v)
When positioning the HVS, the following
points shall be noted:
a.
a horizontal platform with appropriate
support to secure the samples against gusty wind shall be provided;
b.
no two samplers shall be placed less than 2m
apart;
c.
the distance between the HVS and an obstacle,
such as buildings, must be at least twice the height that the obstacle
protrudes above the HVS;
d.
a minimum of 2 m separation from walls, parapets and
penthouses is required for HVS at the rooftop;
e.
a minimum of 2 m separation from any supporting structure,
measures horizontally is required;
f.
no furnace or incinerator flue is nearby;
g.
airflow around the sampler is unrestricted;
h.
the HVS is more than 20 m from the dripline;
i.
any wire fence and gate to protect the HVS,
shall not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
j.
permission must be obtained to set up the HVS
and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and
k.
a secured
supply of electricity is needed to operate the HVS.
3.3.6
Alternative monitoring location shall agree with IEC and seek for EPD approval.
Construction
Noise
3.3.7
There were are
four (4) noise monitoring locations / noise sensitive receivers (NSR) recommended
in the Approved EM&A Manual Section 6.5.1.1. Site visits were conducted by the
Contractor and ET on 6th & 10th April 2018 to review
and study sensitive
receivers at surrounding and adjacent to the Project. Four designated noise monitoring locations recommended
in the Approved EM&A
Manual were identified
during the site visits. They were listed in Table 3-4 and shown in Appendix D.
Table 3-4 Designated
Construction Noise Monitoring Location under the Project
Location
ID |
NSR ID in EIA |
Description |
Location |
CN-1 |
N5-2 |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road (free
field condition) |
CN-2 |
N9-1 |
Village house to
the north of Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling Village House No. 25 (free field condition) |
CN-3 |
N18-5 |
Village house near
San Uk Ling |
San Uk Ling Village House No. 18 (free field condition) |
CN-4 |
N21-4 |
Village
house of Muk Wu |
Muk Wu Village House No. 267 (1m façade from the building) |
3.3.8
Based on rationale in Section 3.3.2, the Contract-related noise monitoring location under construction
phase of Contract 1 is listed in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Noise Monitoring Location as Related
the Works Contract-1
Location
ID |
ASR ID in EIA |
Description |
Location |
CN-1 |
N5-2 |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road |
Village
house to the west of Sha Ling Road (free
field condition) |
CN-2 |
N9-1 |
Village house to
the north of Man Kam To Road |
Sha Ling Village House No. 25 (free field condition) |
Water Quality
3.3.9
There were four (4) water quality monitoring
locations recommended in the Approved EM&A
Manual Section 7.6.1.2. The locations and coordinates of water quality monitoring were listed in Table 3-6 and illustrated in Appendix D.
Table 3-6 Designated
Water Quality Monitoring Stations under the Project
Proposed Location ID |
Co-ordinates |
Description |
|
North |
East |
||
M1 |
843 431 |
831 308 |
Midstream
of Nam Hang Stream |
M2 |
843 840 |
831 101 |
Downstream
of Nam Hang Stream |
M3 |
843 509 |
830 040 |
Wetland
in the Conservation Area (CA) near Yuen Leng Chai |
M4 |
843 997 |
831 783 |
Watercourse across Lin Ma
Hang Road, running from east of San Uk Ling to Man
Kam To Boundary Control Point |
3.3.10 Based on
rationale in
Section 3.3.2, the
Contract-related water
quality monitoring station under construction phase of Contract 1 is listed in Table 3-7.
Table 3-7 Water
Quality Monitoring Station as Related the Works Contract-1
Proposed Location ID |
Co-ordinates |
Description |
|
North |
East |
||
M3 |
843 509 |
830 040 |
Wetland
in the Conservation Area (CA) near Yuen Leng Chai |
3.4.1
The requirements of impact monitoring were stipulated in Sections 5.8.1.1, 6.7.1.1 and
7.8.1.4 of the approved EM&A
Manual and presented as follows.
Air Quality
Monitoring
3.4.2
Monitoring frequency for air quality impact monitoring is as follows:
1-Hour TSP |
3 sets of 1-hour TSP monitoring shall be
carried out once every six days during construction periods |
24-Hour TSP |
Once 24-hour TSP monitoring shall be
carried out every six days during construction periods |
Noise Monitoring
3.4.3
Noise impact monitoring shall be carried out once per week during
construction periods. The noise measurement
for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours shall be measured in terms of Leq (30 minutes) or 6 sets of Leq (5mins).
Water Quality Monitoring
3.4.4
The monitoring frequency shall be 3 days per week during
construction phase and the interval between two sets of monitoring shall not be less
than 36 hours.
3.5.1
The
monitoring equipment using for the EM&A program as proposed by the ET shall
be verified by the IEC.
Air Quality
Monitoring
3.5.2
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be measured by following
the standard high volume sampling method as set out in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. If ET proposes to use a direct reading
dust meter to measure 1-hour TSP levels, it shall submit sufficient information
to IEC for approval.
3.5.3
The filter paper
of 24-hour TSP measurement shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory.
3.5.4
All equipment used by ET for air quality monitoring is listed in Table
3-8.
Table 3-8 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-Hr TSP |
|
High Volume Air
Sampler (HVAS) |
TISCH High Volume Air Sampler, HVS Model
TE-5170 |
Calibration
Kit |
TISCH Model TE-5025A |
1-Hour TSP |
|
Portable Dust Meter |
Sibata LD-3 Laser Dust monitor
Particle Mass Profiler & Counter |
Wind Data Monitoring Equipment
3.5.5
According to the approved EM&A Manual, wind data monitoring
equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging wind speed and wind
direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location shall
be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
1)
The wind sensors should be installed 10 m above ground so that
they are clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by buildings.
2)
The wind data should be captured by a data logger. The data shall
be downloaded for analysis at least once a month.
3)
The wind data monitoring equipment should be re-calibrated at
least once every six months.
4)
Wind direction should be divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees
each.
3.5.6
ET has liaised with the premises owners/ landlords to grant the permission
for the HVS installation. However, they rejected to set
up wind data
monitoring equipment installation in their premises.
3.5.7
Under this situation, the ET proposed to obtain representative
wind data from the Hong Kong Observatory Ta Kwu Ling Weather Station. Ta Kwu Ling Station is located near the Project site which situated at the sea level above 15mPD and
the wind data
monitoring equipment is installed 10 m above the existing ground.
Noise Monitoring
3.5.8
Sound level meter in compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1)
and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying out the noise
monitoring. The sound level meter
shall be checked using an acoustic calibrator. The wind speed shall be checked with a
portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind speed in ms-1
before each noise monitoring event.
Noise measurements should not be made in fog, rain, wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m s-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m s-1.
3.5.9
Noise monitoring equipment used for impact monitoring is listed in
Table
3-9.
Table 3-9 Noise
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
B&K
Type 2238 |
Calibrator |
B&K
Type 4231 |
Portable Wind Speed Indicator |
Testo Anemometer |
3.5.10 Sound level meters listed above
comply with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651: 1979 (Type 1)
and 804: 1985 (Type 1)
specifications, as recommended in TM issued under the NCO.
Water Quality
Monitoring
3.5.11 Water
quality parameters include dissolved oxygen, water
temperature & depth, turbidity, salinity, pH and stream flow velocity shall
be measured in-situ, and suspended solids shall be analyzed by a HOKLAS-accredited
testing laboratory.
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measurement
3.5.12 The dissolved oxygen (DO)
measuring instruments should be portable and weatherproof. The equipment should
also complete with cable and sensor, and DC power source. It should be capable
of measuring:
• A DO level
in the range of 0 ¡V 20 mg/L and 0 ¡V 200% saturation; and
• A temperature of 0 ¡V 45 degree Celsius.
3.5.13
The equipment
should have a membrane electrode with automatic temperature compensation
complete with a cable.
3.5.14
Should
salinity compensation not be built-in to the DO equipment, in-situ salinity
should be measured to calibrate the DO measuring instruments prior to each
measurement.
Turbidity Measurement
3.5.15
The turbidity measuring instruments should be
a portable and weatherproof with DC power source. It should have a photoelectric sensor
capable of measuring turbidity level between 0¡V1000 NTU (for example, Hach model 2100Q or an
approved similar instrument).
Salinity Measurement
3.5.16
A portable salinometer
capable of measuring salinity in the range of 0¡V40 parts per thousand (ppt) should be provided for measuring salinity of the water
at each monitoring location.
pH Measurement
3.5.17
A portable pH meter capable of measuring a
range between 0.0 and 14.0 should be provided to measure pH under the specified
conditions accordingly to the APHA Standard Methods.
Water Depth Measurement
3.5.18
A portable, battery-operated echo sounder or
an approved similar instrument should be used for water depths determination at
each designated monitoring station.
Stream Flow Velocity Equipment
3.5.19
Since the EM&A Manuals do not specified instrument to use
stream flow velocity measurement, the monitoring of stream flow velocity is
therefore proposed to be conducted by using a flow probe which is a digital
water velocity meter.
Water Sampling Equipment
3.5.20
A water sampler is required for suspended
solid (SS) monitoring. A water sampler e.g. Kahlsico Water Sampler, which is a transparent PVC cylinder
with capacity not less than 2 litres, will be used
for water sampling if water depth over than 0.5m.
3.5.21
For sampling from very shallow water depths e.g. <0.5 m, water
sample will be collected from water surface below 100mm using plastic bottle to avoid
inclusion of bottom sediment or humus.
Moreover, Teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling buckets maybe
used for water sampling. The
equipment used for sampling will be depended the sampling location and depth
situations.
Sample Containers and Storage
3.5.22
Water samples for suspended solid should be
stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in
ice (cooled to 4¢XC without being frozen) and delivered to the laboratory within 24
hours of collection and be analyzed as soon as possible after collection.
3.5.23 Analysis of suspended solids
should be carried out in a HOKLAS or other accredited laboratory. Water samples
of about 1L should be collected at the monitoring stations for carrying out the
laboratory suspended solids determination. The SS determination work should start
within 24 hours after collection of the water samples. The SS analyses should
follow the APHA Standard Methods 2540D
with Limit of Reporting of 2 mg/L.
3.5.24 Details of the equipment used for water
quality monitoring are listed in Table 3-10
below.
Table 3-10 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Depth Detector |
Tape measures |
Water Sampler |
A
2-litre transparent PVC cylinder with latex cups at both ends or teflon/stainless steel bailer or self-made sampling
bucket |
Thermometer & DO meter |
YSI 550A / YSI Pro 20 |
pH meter |
AZ8685 pH meter |
Turbidimeter |
Hach 2100Q |
Salinometer |
Atago refractometer Atago S Salinity Meter /
AZ8371 Salinity Meter |
Stream Flow Velocity |
FP211 Global Flow Probe |
Sample Container |
High density polythene
bottles (provided by laboratory) |
Storage Container |
¡¥Willow¡¦ 33-litter plastic
cool box with Ice pad |
3.5.25 Furthermore, Suspended solids (SS) analysis was carried out by ALS Technichem
(HK) Pty Ltd, he is one a local HOKLAS-accredited laboratory
3.6.1
The HVAS is operated and calibrated on a regular basis in
accordance with the manufacturer¡¦s instruction using Tisch
Calibration Kit Model TE-5025A.
Calibration would carry out in two month interval. The calibration data are properly
documented and the records are maintained by ET for future reference. Furthermore, Tisch Calibration Kit will be
calibrated by the manufacturer in yearly basis.
3.6.2
The 1-hour TSP meter calibrated by a local HOKLAS-accredited
laboratory would be undertaken in yearly basis. Zero response of the equipment was
checked before and after each monitoring event.
3.6.3
The sound level meter and acoustic calibrator are
calibrated and certified by a laboratory accredited under HOKLAS or any other
international accreditation scheme at yearly basis.
3.6.4
The multi-parameter Water Quality Monitoring
System is calibrated by HOKLAS accredited laboratory of three month intervals.
3.6.5
All updated calibration certificates of
the monitoring equipment used for the impact monitoring program in this
Reporting Month are attached in Appendix E.
3.7.1
The
impact monitoring data are handled by the ET¡¦s systematic data recording and
management, which complies with in-house Quality Management System. Standard
Field Data Sheets (FDS) are used in the impact monitoring program.
3.7.2
The
monitoring data recorded in the equipment e.g. 1-hour TSP meter, noise meter
and Multi-parameter Water
Quality Monitoring System are downloaded
directly from the equipment at the end of each monitoring day. The downloaded monitoring data are input
into a computerized database properly maintained by the ET. The laboratory results are input
directly into the computerized database and QA/QC checked by personnel other
than those who input the data. For
monitoring activities require laboratory analysis, the local laboratory follows
the QA/QC requirements as set out under the HOKLAS scheme for all laboratory
testing.
3.8.1
The baseline monitoring results form the basis for
determining the environmental acceptance criteria for the impact monitoring. the air quality, construction noise and
water quality criteria, namely Action and Limit levels were established according to
Approved EM&A Manual, and they are listed in Tables 3-11, 3-12 and 3-13
below.
Table 3-11 Action and Limit Levels for Air
Quality Monitoring
Monitoring
Stations |
Action
Level (mg/m3) |
Limit
Level (mg/m3) |
||
1-hour |
24-hour |
1-hour |
24-hour |
|
ASR-1 |
331 |
181 |
500 |
260 |
Table 3-12 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Time
Period |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
0700-1900 hours on normal
weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received |
> 75*
dB(A) |
Note: * Reduces to 70 dB(A)
for schools and 65 dB(A) during the school examination periods.
Table 3-13 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Monitoring Location |
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity (NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
|||
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
M3 |
4.58 |
4.49 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
9.3 |
9.5 |
Notes: •
For DO, non-compliance of the water
quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits •
For turbidity and SS, non-compliance of
the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the
limits. |
3.8.2
Should
non-compliance of the environmental quality criteria occurs, remedial actions
will be triggered according to the Event and Action Plan enclosed in Appendix F.
4.1.1
Air quality impact monitoring schedule was submitted to
all relevant parties which shown in Appendix G.
4.1.2
In this
Reporting
Period, 6 occasions 24-hour TSP and 15
occasions 1-hour TSP of the air
quality monitoring was undertaken at designated air quality monitoring location ASR-1.
The monitoring results for
24-hour and 1-hour TSP are summarized in Table 4-1. The database of 24-hour TSP is shown in Appendix H and the graphical plots of 24-hour and 1-hour
TSP result
are shown in Appendix I.
Table
4-1 Summary
of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results at ASR-1
Date |
24-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
1-hour
TSP (mg/m3) |
||||
Date |
Start Time |
1st hour
measured |
2nd hour
measured |
3rd hour
measured |
||
2-Oct-18 |
102 |
3-Oct-18 |
9:47 |
114 |
121 |
127 |
8-Oct-18 |
96 |
9-Oct-18 |
9:19 |
108 |
114 |
120 |
13-Oct-18 |
97 |
15-Oct-18 |
9:46 |
50 |
57 |
62 |
19-Oct-18 |
75 |
20-Oct-18 |
9:37 |
87 |
92 |
73 |
25-Oct-18 |
92 |
26-Oct-18 |
9:54 |
66 |
68 |
67 |
31-Oct-18 |
95 |
|
||||
Average (Range) |
93 (75
- 102) |
Average (Range) |
88 (50 ¡V 127) |
4.1.3
The
meteorological data during the impact monitoring days are summarized in Appendix J.
4.2.1
As shown
in Table 4-1, the monitoring results of 24-hour and 1-hour TSP monitoring in the Reporting Month were well below the Action Level. No Notification of Exceedance (NOE) of air quality monitoring criteria was issued and therefore corrective action was not required.
5.1.1
Noise impact monitoring schedule was submitted to
all relevant parties which shown in Appendix G.
5.1.2
In
this Reporting
Month, 4
occasions of noise monitoring were undertaken at designated noise monitoring
location CN-1. The sound level were set in a free field situation, and therefore a façade correction of +3dB(A)
has been added according to acoustical principles and EPD guidelines. Since the distance of current construction works of Contract 1 over 300m from CN-2,
noise monitoring was not performed at that
location in this Reporting Month. The monitoring result of noise monitoring is show in Table 5-1 and the
graphical plots are shown in Appendix I.
Table
5-1 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results,
dB(A) ¡V CN1
Date |
Start
Time |
1st
Leq5min |
2nd
Leq5min |
3rd
Leq5min |
4th
Leq5min |
5th
Leq5min |
6th
Leq5min |
Leq30min |
Corrected* Leq30min |
3-Oct-18 |
9:50 |
61.8 |
62.7 |
61.5 |
61.8 |
62.7 |
60.7 |
62 |
65 |
9-Oct-18 |
9:16 |
69.8 |
72.5 |
68.2 |
70.2 |
67.3 |
69.4 |
70 |
73 |
15-Oct-18 |
9:43 |
67.1 |
67.1 |
64.5 |
61.7 |
65.5 |
62.9 |
65 |
68 |
26-Oct-18 |
10:00 |
60.0 |
65.7 |
67.5 |
68.3 |
66.7 |
70.8 |
68 |
71 |
Limit Level |
- |
75 |
(*) A façade correction of +3dB(A) has
been added according to acoustical principles and EPD guidelines.
5.1.3
Prior and after noise monitoring, the accuracy of the sound level meter
has been checked by
an acoustic calibrator to
ensure the measurement within acceptance range of ¡Ó0.5dB. Moreover, wind speed checked
by portable wind speed meter has
been performed before noise monitoring. No
noise measurement was performed in fog, rain, wind with a steady speed
exceeding 5 m s-1 or wind with gusts exceeding 10 m s-1.
5.2.1
As
shown in Table 5-1, no noise monitoring results exceeded the Limit Level in the Reporting Month. No Notification of Exceedance (NOE) of construction
noise criterion was issued and no corrective action was therefore required.
6.1.1
Water quality impact monitoring schedule was submitted to all relevant
parties which shown in Appendix G.
6.1.2
In the Reporting Month,
a total of 14 monitoring
days were carried
out at designated monitoring station M3 for water quality impact monitoring.
The monitoring result of key parameters including Dissolved
Oxygen, Turbidity and
Suspended Solids are summarized in Table 6-1. Detailed monitoring results including
in-situ measurements and laboratory analysis data are shown in Appendix H and graphical
plots for monitoring
result are shown in Appendix I.
Table 6-1 Summary
of Water Quality Monitoring Results ¡V M3
Date |
Parameters |
||
DO (Averaged) (mg/L) |
Turbidity (Averaged) (NTU) |
Suspended
Solids
(Averaged) (mg/L) |
|
2-Oct-18 |
4.76 |
8.0 |
6.0 |
4-Oct-18 |
4.92 |
5.5 |
8.5 |
6-Oct-18 |
5.22 |
5.6 |
6.5 |
9-Oct-18 |
4.63 |
5.6 |
9.0 |
11-Oct-18 |
4.64 |
7.8 |
7.0 |
13-Oct-18 |
5.40 |
5.3 |
6.0 |
16-Oct-18 |
|